The Learned Lady in England, 1650-1760Reynolds, Myra
History
The Learned Lady in England, 1650-1760
Reynolds, Myra
Women -- Education -- Great Britain; Women -- Great Britain; Women authors, English
At eighteen she was appointed maid of honor to Queen Henrietta Maria
and accompanied her to France. There, at twenty, she became the
second wife of the Duke of Newcastle, a nobleman thirty-two years
older than herself, but who was, she says, "the onely Person I ever
was in love with." She was with him during the trying years of his
absence from England and it was during this difficult and tedious
period that literature became her resource. Her publications began
with _Philosophical Fancies_ in 1653 and closed with _Grounds of
Natural Philosophy_ in 1668, during which period she wrote nearly
twelve folio volumes. The portions of her work concerning which she
felt the greatest measure of self-congratulation were her studies in
natural philosophy. Her _Philosophical Fancies_ of 1653 was expanded
in 1655, and in 1663 received its final form as _Philosophical and
Physical Opinions_. Of all her books this was "her best beloved and
favourite." But the quality on which she chiefly prides herself is
the very one that nullifies her work. Originality is her great boast,
an originality so pronounced as to refuse to base its deductions on
the writings of previous thinkers. Her husband substantiates her
claim. He says that all her philosophical fancies are spun out of
her own brain, and that, if she does not use the technical terms of
philosophers, it is because her language is her own too. She has
scorned to talk with any "profest scholar" to learn his phraseology.
"She did never impe her high-flying Phancies, with any old broken
Fethers out of any university."[96] She says herself that she could
never "afford board-room to other people's ideas lest the legitimate
offspring of her own brain should be crowded out."[97] In Part IV,
"On the Motion of the Bodie," we find that the Duchess has never
studied anatomy, but this apparent disqualification does not prove
inhibitory. In _An Epistle to the Reader_ she explains the situation:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account