The Leatherworker in Eighteenth-Century Williamsburg: Being an Account of the Nature of Leather, & of the Crafts Commonly Engaged in the Making & Using of It. — John Shaqi
The Leatherworker in Eighteenth-Century Williamsburg: Being an Account of the Nature of Leather, & of the Crafts Commonly Engaged in the Making & Using of It.Ford, Thomas K.
History
The Leatherworker in Eighteenth-Century Williamsburg: Being an Account of the Nature of Leather, & of the Crafts Commonly Engaged in the Making & Using of It.
Ford, Thomas K.
Leatherwork -- Virginia -- Williamsburg
Curiously, the initial groups of colonists sent to Jamestown by the
Virginia Company lacked any leather craftsmen. Somehow the London
“adventurers” thought that the real adventurers to America could get
along without tanners, curriers, or shoemakers. Just how the colonists
were expected to acquire shoes grows even more puzzling in light of the
English law that forbade exportation of goods made of English leather.
In a few years, however, some tanners and shoemakers had been sent over
and were at work in Jamestown. But not enough of them came or else (as
is more likely) they abandoned their trades to grow tobacco. A 1625
report declared that an extreme shortage of shoes and other apparel
endangered the health of the population. Soon thereafter the Virginia
Assembly took the first of many steps to promote leathermaking and other
manufactures in the colony.
Sometimes with the support of the home government, sometimes without,
the assembly passed laws in 1632, 1645, 1658, 1660, 1662, 1680, and 1682
forbidding the export from Virginia of hides, skins, and certain other
commodities. They hoped in this way to assure ample supplies of the raw
materials and thus encourage colonial craftsmen to make more of the
needed products.
The legislation, in actuality, had less effect in Virginia than in
England. Colonial craftsmen continued to prefer leathers imported from
England, reputed to be the best of their kinds, for quality work—and to
prefer tobacco growing to leatherworking anyway. But English merchants
and craftsmen repeatedly protested the threat of competition in a market
they felt belonged solely to them, so each colonial law in turn was
either repealed on orders from London or simply allowed to lapse.
The 1662 effort, somewhat more elaborate than the others, had no greater
success in the end. At Jamestown the legislature that year passed three
laws intended to increase local manufactures. One barred the export of
hides, wool, and iron; another exempted from taxation any craftsman who
followed his trade and did not plant tobacco; the third required each
county in the colony of Virginia to erect “one or more tanhouses, and
... provide tanners, curryers and shoemakers, to tanne, curry and make
the hides of the country into leather and shoes.” The manager of this
trade for each county was to allow the people two pounds of tobacco for
each pound of dry hide they brought to the tannery, and “sell them shoos
at thirty pounds of tobacco [for] plaine shoos, and thirty five pounds
of tobacco for [shoes with] wooden heels and ffrench falls of the ...
largest sizes, and twenty pounds of tobacco per pair for the smaller
shoos.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account