Transcriber's Notes: In this version, the oe ligature has been replaced by the two letters, e.g. dioececis. Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_). Text enclosed by equal signs is in bold face (=bold=). The original text contained Greek letters which have been transliterated in this version and enclosed in asterisks, e.g. *paroikia*. Minor punctuation errors in the original text have been corrected in this version. Handbooks for the Clergy EDITED BY ARTHUR W. ROBINSON, B.D. VICAR OF ALLHALLOWS BARKING BY THE TOWER THE LEGAL POSITION OF THE CLERGY THE LEGAL POSITION OF THE CLERGY BY P. V. SMITH, LL.D. CHANCELLOR OF THE DIOCESE OF MANCHESTER AUTHOR OF "THE LAW OF CHURCHWARDENS AND SIDESMEN IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY," ETC. LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON NEW YORK AND BOMBAY 1905 _All rights reserved_ PREFACE In the following pages an endeavour has been made to give a succinct sketch of the legal position of the parish clergy of the Church of England in respect both of spiritualities and of temporalities. The book, being intended for their use, does not touch upon the subject of ordination by which they acquired the status of deacons or priests. Nor does it deal with the episcopate or the non-parochial clergy, except so far as these subjects are connected with the parochial system. Like all other human arrangements, our English Church law is, of course, far from being ideally perfect. It may be safely affirmed that there has never been either a Church or a State in which the law has actually been what it ideally ought to have been. It is important to recognise the difference between the two positions; for there has sometimes been a disposition on the part of individuals to confuse them, and to treat what they consider to be the ideal law, as if it were the actual law, and as if, as such, it demanded their loyal obedience. Such an attitude, whether in ecclesiastical or civil matters, is anarchical in its tendency; for it sets up private judgment instead of the constituted authority as the criterion of what ought or ought not to be done. It can only be justified where the actual law is absolutely inconsistent with the fundamental principles of morality or of Christian truth. The object of the present treatise is to state succinctly what the law is,--not what it ought to be; and no opinion is expressed or suggestion offered as to points in which amendment would be proper or expedient.