[244] Tongue _v._ Allen (1835) 1 Curt. 38; (1836) 1 Moo. P. C. 90; Midgley _v._ Wood (1860) 30 L. J. P. M. & A. 57; R. _v._ Billingshurst (1814) 3 M. & S. 250. Where the woman was an illegitimate child, and had the banns published in the name of her mother, which she had never in fact borne, Sir John Dodson, in adjudging the marriage void, said that he had some doubt whether, in the case of an illegitimate child, the publication of the banns in the name of its mother, instead of the name of notoriety and repute, would necessarily be such an undue publication as would nullify the marriage. No doubt the name which a person under such circumstances had fully acquired was that in which the publication of banns should take place; but there might be a case in which, without fraudulent intent, and from an innocent misapprehension of what was correct, the name of the mother might be used instead of that subsequently acquired; Tooth _v._ Barrow (1854) 1 Eccl. & Adm. 371, at p. 374. [245] Mayhew _v._ Mayhew (1812) 3 M. & S. 266. [246] (1823) 4 Geo. 4, c. 76, s. 6. [247] _Ib._ s. 8. [248] (1836) 6 & 7 Will. 4, c. 85, ss. 1, 11, 15, 16; (1837) 7 Will. 4 & 1 Vict. c. 22, s. 36; (1856) 19 & 20 Vict. c. 119, s. 11. [249] Canons 101-104; (1823) 4 Geo. 4, c. 76, s. 14. [250] Tuckness _v._ Alexander (1863) 2 Dr. & Sm. 614; 32 L. J. Ch. 794. [251] Bevan _v._ M'Mahon (1861) 30 L. J. P. M. & A. 61. [252] Prince of Capua _v._ Count de Ludolf (1836) 30 L. J. P. M. & A. 71 (n.). [253] (1823) 4 Geo. 4, c. 76, ss. 9, 19. It is safest to construe this period as lunar months, _i.e._ twelve weeks; see 2 Bl. Comm. 141; Lacon _v._ Hooper (1795) 6 T. R. 224. [254] 6 & 7 Will. 4, c. 85, s. 15. [255] (1886) 49 & 50 Vict. c. 14; Canons of 1888. [256] Wats. ch. xiv. p. 146; Reg. _v._ Millis (1844) 10 Cl. & F. 534, 859, 860. [257] Beamish _v._ Beamish (1861) 9 H. L. C. 274. [258] Canon 62; (1823) 4 Geo. 4, c. 76, s. 28; Wing _v._ Taylor (1861) 2 Sw. & Tr. 278; 7 Jur. N. S. 737. [259] (1823) 4 Geo. 4, c. 76, s. 21. [260] (1856) 19 & 20 Vict. c. 119, s. 12. [261] Phill. Eccl. Law. 629; Piers _v._ Piers (1849) 2 H. L. C. 331; 13 Jur. 569. [262] Bryant _v._ Foot (1867) L. R. 2 Q. B. 161; aff. (1868) 3 _Ib._ 497. [263] 59 Geo. 3, c. 134, s. 11; 6 & 7 Vict. c. 37, s. 15; 19 & 20 Vict. c. 104, ss. 14, 15. [264] (1836) 6 & 7 Will. 4. c. 86, ss. 30, 31, 33, 35, 40-44, sch. (C); (1837) 7 Will. 4 & 1 Vict. c. 22, ss. 25-29. [265] Hyde _v._ Hyde (1866) L. R. 1 P. & D. 130; _Re_ Bethell (1888) 38 Ch. D. 220. [266] Goodman _v._ Goodman (1859) 28 L. J. Ch. 745; The Breadalbane Case (1867) L. R. 1 H. L. Sc. 182; Geary, 140-142. [267] Ruding _v._ Smith (1821) 2 Hag. Cons. 371, at pp. 390, 391. [268] Brook _v._ Brook (1861) 9 H. L. C. 193; 4 L. T. N. S. 93. [269] Reg. _v._ Millis (1844) 10 Cl. & F. 534; 8 Jur. 917; Culling _v._ Culling (1896) P. 116. CHAPTER VII BURIAL