The Lenâpé and Their Legends: With the complete text and symbols of the Walam olum, a new translation, and an inquiry into its authenticityBrinton, Daniel G. (Daniel Garrison)
History
The Lenâpé and Their Legends: With the complete text and symbols of the Walam olum, a new translation, and an inquiry into its authenticity
Brinton, Daniel G. (Daniel Garrison)
Delaware Indians; Delaware language -- Texts; Picture-writing, Indian
60. They are peaceful, they have great things, who are they?
FOOTNOTES:
[259] Read, _woak_.
[260] Var _moshalguat_.
[261] Var. _showoken_.
[262] Var. _menakinep_.
[263] Var _wapanahan_.
[264] Var _mixtisipi_.
NOTES
The references to authorities on Algonkin picture-writing are the
Appendix to _Tanner's Narrative of Captivity and Adventures_, Copway's
_Traditional History of the Ojibway Nation_, and Schoolcraft's
_Synopsis of Indian Symbols_, in Vol. I of his _History and Statistics
of the Indian Tribes_. I have not pursued an investigation of the
symbols beyond the first chant.
1. Rafinesque translates _wemiguna_ "all sea water." The proper form
is _wemmguna_, "at all times" (Anthony). The symbol is that of the
sky and clouds above the earth. Compare Copway, p. 134; Schoolcraft,
_Synopsis_, Fig. 17.
2. _Kwelik_, a dialectic form of _quenek_, Z. long, stretched out.
_Kitanito_, a compound of _kehtan_, great, and _manito_, mysterious
being, is rendered by Raf. as Creator; _wit_ is the substantive
verbaffix.
Heckewelder (MSS.) distinguishes between the synthetic form,
_ketanittowit_, which he translates "Majestic Being," and the analytic
form, _kitschi manito_, which he renders "Supreme Wonder-doer." In
the latter, the sense of _manito_ is brought out. In the Delaware and
related dialects it conveys the idea of making, or doing (_maniton_, to
make, Zeisberger, _Gram._, p. 222; _maranito taendo_, make a fire,
Campamus; Chipeway, _win ma-nitawito_ he himself makes it, or, can make
it).
The idea of making or creating is at the bottom of many native titles
to supernatural powers, as the Shawnee _We-shellaqua_, "he that made us
all." (Rev. David Jones, Journal of Two Visits, etc., p. 62.) See notes
to line four. The Algonkin root, _etu_, he does, he acts, he makes,
would therefore seem to be a radical of the word. (See Howse,
_Gram. of the Cree Lang_., p. 160.)
Dr. Trumbull, on the other hand, believes the only radical to be _an_,
= _el_ or _al_, in the sense of "to be more than," "to surpass," "to
exceed;" and maintains that the syllable _it_, of the theme _manit_, is
a formative suffix. (In _Old and New_, March, 1870.)
Heckewelder, in his translation "wonder-doer," recognizes the force
of both elements, and from the analogous expressions I have quoted,
is probably correct. The element _an_ is thus an intensive prefix
to the real root _it_, and the compound radical thus formed in the
third person, singular, _månito_, means "he or it does or acts in a
surpassing or extraordinary manner."
_Essop_, pl. _essopak_, frequently recurring words, are suppositive
(see p. 90) forms of the verb _lissin_, "to be or do so, to be so
situated, disposed, _or_ acting" (Zeisberger, _Gram._ p. 117). The
terminal _p_ is the sign of the preterite. They are dialectic for
_elsitup_ and _elsichtitup_.
The symbol of a head with rays represents a manito. Schoolcraft,
_Synopsis_, Fig. 10.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account