Produced by David Garcia, Paul Marshall, Marilynda Fraser-Cunliffe and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive) Transcriber Notes: Obvious misspellings and omissions were corrected. Uncertain misspellings or ancient words were not corrected. Errors in punctuation and inconsistent hyphenation were not corrected unless otherwise noted. The underscores before and after words indicate italics in the original. [Illustration: FIG. 1.--The Lenape Stone--(actual size)--Aboriginal picture representing Indians fighting the Hairy Mammoth--discovered in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, 1872 and 1881.] THE LENAPE STONE OR THE INDIAN AND THE MAMMOTH BY H. C. MERCER NEW YORK & LONDON G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS The Knickerbocker Press 1885 COPYRIGHT BY H. C. MERCER 1885 Press of G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS New York PREFACE. In claiming an impartial examination of so extraordinary a carving as the "Lenape Stone" at the hands of archæologists, the writer has had several difficulties to contend with. _First_, The fact that the carving is quite unique, it being the first aboriginal _carving_ of the mammoth thus far claimed to have been discovered in North America. _Second_, That no "scientific observer" was present at the discovery. _Third_, That since its discovery the Stone has been several times cleaned, and that thereby many geological tests of its authenticity have been rendered impossible. _Fourth_, That within the last few years, and particularly in Philadelphia, serious frauds have been perpetrated upon lovers of Indian relics. These considerations may well have been sufficient to prejudice the mind of a stranger against the alleged wonderful Indian relic, yet they should in no case suffice to prevent, on the part of the archæologists, a thorough and impartial examination of all the evidence pertaining to its discovery. In presenting this and other evidence, the writer has wished only to be impartial, and to be led by the facts as they have presented themselves, and for the examination of which his opportunities have been peculiarly favorable. In his knowledge of the neighborhood and its people (his home), an acquaintance with all the persons concerned, and very frequent visits to the Hansell Farm, nothing has yet occurred to shake his faith in the unimpeachable evidence of an honest discovery. Yet should any fresh light be brought to bear upon the subject, however at variance with this opinion, it will be welcomed.