The Letter-Bag of Lady Elizabeth Spencer-Stanhope — Volume 1
History
The Letter-Bag of Lady Elizabeth Spencer-Stanhope — Volume 1
Great Britain -- Social life and customs -- 19th century; Spencer-Stanhope, Elizabeth Wilhelmina Coke, Lady, 1795-1873
Meanwhile the news from the continent was again calculated to arrest the
attention of the most frivolous amongst the gay world of London. Events
were assuming a more threatening aspect. The long-protracted Peninsular
war had begun; but Sir Arthur Wellesley, dispatched to the relief of
Portugal, three weeks after landing defeated Junot in a decisive victory
at Roliga, on August 17th, 1808. Had he then pushed on, as it was said he
wished to do, the whole French army must have surrendered; but his
superior officers, Sir Harry Burrard and Sir Hugh Dalrymple, who landed on
the two succeeding days, forbade all pursuit, and, it was asserted,
obliged Wellesley to sign with them the pitiful Convention of Cintra,
which allowed the French army to evacuate Portugal unharmed, and to be
carried on British ships back to France. Junot admitted frankly that his
men would have capitulated had they been pursued but two miles by the
English, and so great was the indignation roused in England by the news of
this fiasco, that the three generals demanded and obtained a court-
martial. All were acquitted; but Wellesley, who had denounced the
Convention vehemently before the Court, was instantly employed again, an
honour which was denied to his superior officers. Hence the refrain, which
became a favourite at the time.
Sir Arthur and Sir Harry, Sir Harry and Sir Hew,
Doodle, doodle, doodle, cock a doodle doo!
Sir Arthur was a gallant knight, but for the other two
Doodle, doodle, doodle, cock a doodle doo!
Some years afterwards, with regard to this famous occurrence, John
Stanhope wrote in his journal--
I regret that I did not at the time dwell at a greater length upon the
Convention of Cintra.... That Convention and even the battle of
Vimiera, at one time the theme of every tongue, are effaced from the
memory of even us their contemporaries by the more brilliant
achievements of the British army--by successes which have blotted out
all recollections of former errors. I can scarcely recall to my mind
the arguments that were used for and against that Convention by those
who were present at the battle; but the feeling against it in England
was so strong, that, strange as it may appear in these days, at a Race
Ball at Carlisle where I accompanied my father, then Member for that
City, when the Steward, Sir James Graham, gave the health of Sir
Arthur Wellesley, an officer rose and declared that he would not drink
the health of a General _who had disgraced England_.
That Sir Arthur Wellesley was fortunate in throwing the blame from his
own shoulders on to his superiors in command, there can be little
doubt, as notwithstanding the assertion of his friends, it is not
possible to consider the signature of such a man in the situation that
he then held, as a mere matter of official duty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account