The Letters of Cassiodorus: Being a Condensed Translation of the Variae Epistolae of Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus SenatorCassiodorus, Senator
History
The Letters of Cassiodorus: Being a Condensed Translation of the Variae Epistolae of Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus Senator
Cassiodorus, Senator
Goths -- Italy; Italy -- History -- 476-1268
[Here, as in many other passages of Cassiodorus, _pietas_ shows signs
of passing into the Italian _pieta_ (= pity).]
27. KING THEODORIC TO THE SAJO TEZUTZAT,
AND
28. KING THEODORIC TO DUDA, SENATOR AND COMES.
[Sidenote: Petrus assaulted by the Sajo who was assigned for his
protection.]
[Duda was also a Sajo, as we see from Letter 32. Dahn ('Koenige der
Germanen' iv. 142, _n._ 3) thinks he was Comes Gothorum.]
Both letters relate to the affair of Petrus (a Vir Spectabilis, and
probably the same whose admission to the Senate is ordered by iv. 25).
This Roman nobleman, according to a usage common under Theodoric's
government, has had the Gothic Sajo Amara assigned to him as his
Defensor. Amara, by an inversion of his functions, which the letter
bitterly laments and upbraids, has turned upon his _protege_ and even
used personal violence towards him. He has drawn a sword and wounded
him in the hand; and nothing but the fact that Petrus was sheltered by
a door saved him from losing his hand altogether.
Yet, notwithstanding this assault, Amara has had the audacity to claim
from his victim 'commodi nomine,' the usual payment made by the
defended to the defender.
The first letter decrees that this shall be refunded twofold, and
assigns Tezutzat instead of Amara to the office of Defender, warning
him not to follow the evil example of his predecessor.
The second assigns to Duda the task of enquiring into the alleged
assault and punishing it with the sword[346].
[Footnote 346: The story of this assault is a typical specimen of the
style of Cassiodorus, high-flown yet not really pictorial: 'Ita ut
ictum gladii in se demersum, aliquatenus postium retardaret objectio:
subjecta est vulneri manus, quae ut in totum truncata non caderet,
januarum percussa robora praestiterunt: ubi lassato impetu corusca
ferri acies corporis extrema perstrinxit.']
29. KING THEODORIC TO ARGOLICUS, VIR ILLUSTRIS, PRAEFECT OF THE CITY.
[Sidenote: Official tardiness rebuked.]
A sharp rebuke to him for having (if the _suggestio_ of the
Clarissimus Armentarius be correct) so long delayed, it is to be
feared with a corrupt motive, complying with the instructions of the
King to do justice in some case (not described) in which the honour of
the Senate is concerned. As head of the Senate he ought to have been
eager to examine into it, without any prompting from his master.
30. KING THEODORIC TO ALBINUS, VIR ILLUSTRIS AND PATRICIAN.
[Sidenote: Workshops may be erected above the Porticus Curba, by the
Roman Forum.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account