Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
I am glad Frank took so well to your book. I have since wanted to read
it over again, say fresh in the morning to better absorb its many
compact and rich allusions toward your esthétique. Stupid and hasty as
this letter is--I hope you won’t think I am satisfied with it. I’ve got
so much on my mind that you must bear with me until a cool day comes
when I shall not be so tired at night, nor the garret study be so hot as
it is this evening. I enclose some poetry.[20] I think the first part of
“Faustus” is about right now. Tell me what you think of the thing as a
whole. Read it entirely over from the first so as to judge better of my
graduation from the quotidian into the abstract, and tell me frankly
what you think about it. I have been so close to the thing for so long a
time that at present I cannot judge it _synthetically_ at all. The third
part has not been even started yet. The other evening I had a hint for
the speed that I wanted in something like the following [four] lines:
-- -- -- --[20] But I have found nothing yet to satisfy me at all. It must
be a dramatic comment done somewhat in a new idiom. I have got to search
awhile yet for it. Meanwhile I have a homely and gay thing to show you
that I did yesterday out of sheer joy, “Thinking of Bill----“, etc.[21]
-- -- -- --
Joyce is being savoured slowly--with steady pleasure. Meanwhile I find
_Enormous Room_ a stimulating article. It has taught me to better
appreciate Cummings’ poetry--although the things in the last _Broom_ of
his are, I think, boresome. _Since Cezanne_ by Bell has interested me a
good deal.
_Dominick!_ O yes! I think we both were bored with the climacteric after
your departure. I have not seen him since!
“The Bottom of the Sea” is too deep for me to model yet as I want it. I
haven’t forgotten it though.
107: TO CHARMION WIEGAND
_Cleveland, O._ _Aug. 15th, ’22_
Dear Charmion: You will be delighted to know, I’m sure, that the
Anderson trans. matter has been settled. I got a letter from Huebsch
last week saying that he had given Herr Reeck the rights--so _some_
letters got across the waters anyway! This suggests the mention that
Anderson was here about six weeks ago while Munson was visiting me, and
came out to the house for an evening. The man’s personal charm supported
the impressions his letters had given me (we had never actually met
before) but I have been very disappointed in him since he went down to
N. Y. afterward and stirred up a petty rumpus in _The Dial_ office,
about something that Munson told him [in Cleveland] on the subject of
Rosenfeld’s position as a critic, etc. The story is not worth going
into, but it showed Anderson to be surprisingly petty and malignant, not
to say untactful. La-La! Well,--he hasn’t yet destroyed my taste for
some of his work yet--despite that most of my friends don’t value his
work above a Russian rouble.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account