Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
“Pandora’s Box” is a good piece of “general” criticism. It is more
social than literary and is the kind of thing, above all, that Americans
need to read. I hope you find a good market for it. You must let me know
where and when your things are published so I can look for them and get
them.
Since Munson brought me my copy of _Ulysses_ I have been having high
times. A book that in many ways surpasses anything I have ever read. 800
pgs! You must read E. E. Cummings’ _Enormous Room_ for a real
inspiration in language and humanity.
The first issue of _Secession_ does not come up to the second, now out.
You should get it somewhere there in N. Y. and read Cowley’s two poems
and Josephson’s story. “The Oblate.” --/--/
108: TO GORHAM MUNSON
[_Cleveland_] _Friday night_
Dear Gorham: -- -- -- -- My enthusiasms, the hot weather, the onset of hay
fever, the infinite and distasteful detail work I have been doing at the
office, and the suspense of finding another position, etc., etc., have
brought me very near the ground. In fact, for several days this week I
have been unable to retain food and have thought at any moment something
would snap and I would go into a million pieces. I haven’t felt as
“dangerously” for several years. But I am picking up today--since I have
got the job matter settled and informed the office that I shall not be
with them after the first of September. This bit of news I had the
wonderful pleasure of delivering to them just as my boss was starting in
on a series of gentle reprimands, etc., and so instead of ever hearing
the end of that rigmarole--I was begged to remain at a higher salary.
Where I am going however, I shall have complete charge of the copy work
and shall receive ten dollars a week more to start with and a
considerable raise within sixty days. I was literally urged to come with
them--a new agency--which was a unique pleasure for me!
Well,--we heard from Anderson! Rosenfeld’s remarks along with those of
several other artists present at the time of the “trial” were quoted in
effect that S[ommer] was not a notable man at all--had no personal
vision--his work a mixture of half-a-dozen modern influences--and
_couldn’t draw a head on man, woman or animal_! Anderson was very sorry
he had had anything to do with any adverse criticism, etc., etc. So much
for that. Dear G., let us create our own little vicious circle! Let us
erect it on the remains of such as Paul Rosenfeld. But enough of this
for now.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account