Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
Dear Gorham: Everyone writes me such encouraging notes about “F and H”
that I am doubly sorry that I ever sent any to _Broom_ for publication.
Frank wrote me a very shrewd appreciation of Part II which he probably
repeated to you. Untermeyer’s mention of me among the New Patricians
prompted me to send him a copy after reading his article on Eliot in a
recent _Freeman_. I disagreed with him openly on many points, but the
substance of his last paragraph made me think he would be interested in
reading the poem. I was rather foolish to follow such an impulse, but
his answer was quite decent. He made the charge of a new type of
“rhetoric,” however, which is just what Frank took pains to mention as
fully absent. Untermeyer comes here for a lecture on March 11th and says
he wants to have a talk with me if possible. This is all right, but I am
not keen about argument. Allen Tate writes me the most glowing praises
possible, calls me the greatest contemporary American poet, etc., etc.,
so I feel about ready to deliver myself of my memoirs and expire in
roses. And then, your appreciation has especially been enjoyed. You
“get” the form and arrangement of the “Stark Major” poem much better
than Frank does, but he is right about the second paragraph being too
complicated and vague and you are wrong about the last verse being
redundant. When I get the second verse worked out to suit me I’ll send
you another copy. In the meantime I am ruminating on a new longish poem
under the title of _The Bridge_ which carries on further the tendencies
manifest in “F and H.” It will be exceedingly difficult to accomplish it
as I see it now, so much time will be wasted in thinking about it. Your
news about _Broom_ is discouraging in view of the fact that I had just
sent part III of “F and H” to Matty last week. Everything has been
bungled all the way through. I hope I can get enough material together
during the next few months for a small volume where things can be
arranged in proper order. I am so deadly sick of manipulating things
with magazines, _The Dial_ included. This latter refuses my “F and H”
and then takes such a silly thing as that Apleton or what’s-’ername
woman contained this month in its covers. I have been so rushed around
with too much society that I have not yet got at the review for your
study, but it will be done within two weeks anyway. It was much easier
to rap out this enclosed review for Fitts. Let me know what you like or
don’t like about it. I am very awkward at reviews, mainly, I suppose,
because the procedure is strange to me. I am through doing things for
Sommer until he cooperates better. He has received notice and
photographs from _The Dial_ I learn from second hand. Ten days ago this
was. I had especially asked him to phone me as soon as he heard anything
definite from them, certainly a small task, but he never peeps or comes
near. I shall not send back the photographs to you to show to anyone
until he returns them to me.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account