Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
He knows I paid twenty dollars for them and
that I want to keep them circulating, etc. He knew that I would be the
one to write to _The Dial_ and blow ’em up if they failed to keep their
word on the reproductions, and naturally want to know the facts of the
situation, yet he keeps his stolid distance. What’s the use? It’s too
much trouble with all the rest I have to do, though I’d be only too glad
to keep it up indefinitely if he’d show a little interest. --/--/
130: TO ALLEN TATE
[_Cleveland_] _Feb. 6th, ’23_
Dear Allen: I can’t seem to get around to write you a decent
consideration of your recent poems, “Yellow River,” etc. When I get time
to write, as now at the office, they are not by me, and you have already
had evidence of my state of mind at other odd moments. Meanwhile, do not
think me indifferent, please.
I’m afraid you will have to postpone your kind proclamations in regard
to “F and H” until the three parts appear in book form and in proper
sequence. The inadvertency of “The Springs of Guilty Song” in the
_Broom_ is too complicated to explain fully. Josephson is most
unscrupulous in his editorship, and it takes so long to get word back
and forth that I shall probably not send anything more to _Broom_ even
if they finish “F and H” with the other two parts. This is quite
unlikely as Munson writes me doleful presages about its financial
straits. Two more issues and it will probably expire. However, in case
they do print the third part which I sent about two weeks ago, it will
include a note at the bottom of the page explaining the sequence, etc.,
and correcting the misnomer “The Springs of Guilty Song.” In regard to
this latter I had a very fine appreciation from Waldo Frank who was
quite astonished at it. Then with your fine praise and Munson’s I feel
more encouraged than ever about my work. I’m already started on a new
poem, _The Bridge_, which continues the tendencies that are evident in
“Faustus and Helen,” but it’s too vague and nebulous yet to talk about.
In the next _S4N_ I have an amusing parody of Cummings and have asked
Fitts, the editor, to send you a copy. Don’t be puzzled by the name of
this magazine, it’s taken from the insignia of a mosquito fleet during
the war, I think. I wish I could partake of the genuine Tatian Theory,
but it’s not so universal in its application, I fear, as it used to be.
Sherry and bad Port are about all one succeeds in safely absorbing
around here. When am I to expect that promised portrait of you?
131: TO WALDO FRANK
_Cleveland, Ohio_ _Feb. 7th, ’23_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account