Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
work,--for poetry. I shall do my best work later on when I am about 35
or 40. The imagination is the only thing worth a damn. Lately I have
grown terribly isolated, and very egoist. One has to do it [in]
Cleveland. I rush home from work to my room hung with the creations of
Sommer and Lescaze--and fiddle through the evenings. If I could afford
wine _every_ evening I might do more. But I am slow anyway. However,
today I have made a good start on the first part of “Faustus & Helen.” I
am, needless to say, delighted that you like the second part so well.
The other two parts are to be quite different. But, as yet, I am dubious
about the successful eventuation of the poem as a _whole_. Certainly it
is the most ambitious thing I have ever attempted and in it I am
attempting to evolve a conscious pseudo-symphonic construction toward an
abstract beauty that has not been done before in English--at least
directly. If I can get this done in the way I hope--I might get some
consideration for _The Dial_ prize. Perhaps I’m a fool for such
hopes--sooner or later I expect to get that yearly donation. --/--/
I am not going to read this over in the clear sober light of the dawn.
Take it for what it is worth tonight when I seal the envelope--_if_ you
can read it!
102: TO GORHAM MUNSON
[_Cleveland_] _June 22nd_
Dear Gorham: --/--/ This is just rushed off between jobs. I must have
insulted you to the limit with that letter of Sunday night,--but when I
am filled up I am feeling too good to be taken seriously, so please
don’t mind.[19] Your applause of the “Faustus and Helen II” has
heartened me, although I am having a terrible time with the first part
of it. The best way for me to speed up, I guess, is to forget all about
time and be quite indifferent. --/--/
103: TO ----
[_Cleveland_] _4th of July_
Dear ----: --/--/ I am sorry to disappoint you about my “Praise.” There
were no accouchements there at all. Not even temptations in that
direction. It is, or was, entirely “platonic.” Nelson was a Norwegian
who rebelled against the religious restrictions of home and came to
America when a mere kid. Went to art school in Washington and won some
kind of distinguished medal there. As soon as he was through school, an
aunt of his in America who had been paying his tuition abruptly withdrew
all her help and forced him into the prostitution of all his ideals and
a cheap lithographic work that he was never able to pull out of
afterward. He wrote several good poems published in _Scribner’s_ &
_Century_ a long time ago, got married, and I finally met him here in
Cleveland where he had been living in seclusion for a number of years.
One of the best-read people I ever met, wonderful kindliness and
tolerance and a true Nietzschean. He was one of many broken against the
stupidity of American life in such places as here. I think he has had a
lasting influence on me. --/--/
104: TO ALLEN TATE
[_Cleveland_] _July 19th, ’22_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account