The letters of Queen Victoria, vol. 2, 1844-1853 : $b A selection from Her Majesty's correspondence between the years 1837 and 1861.Victoria, Queen of Great Britain
History
The letters of Queen Victoria, vol. 2, 1844-1853 : $b A selection from Her Majesty's correspondence between the years 1837 and 1861.
Victoria, Queen of Great Britain
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1848-1871; Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Sources; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901 -- Correspondence
[Footnote 5: A paragraph had appeared in the _Morning
Chronicle_, giving credence to a rumour that this title was
about to be conferred on the Prince, but, in answer to Mr
Peter Borthwick, Sir Robert Peel positively contradicted it.]
[Footnote 6:
_Sir Robert Peel to the Prince Albert._
WHITEHALL, _15th February 1845._
SIR,--I received yesterday the accompanying note from Mr
Borthwick, and in conformity with the notice therein given,
he put the question to me in the House of Commons last evening
respecting the paragraph which appeared in the _Morning
Chronicle_ respecting the intention of proposing to Parliament
that your Royal Highness should assume the title of King
Consort.
I very much regret that the _Morning Chronicle_ inserted that
paragraph.
The prominent place assigned to it in the newspaper, and a
vague intimation that there was some authority for it, have
caused a certain degree of credit to be attached to it. It has
been copied into all the country newspapers and has given rise
to a good deal of conjecture and speculation, which it is far
from desirable to excite without necessity.
It appears to me that the editor of the _Morning Chronicle_
acted most unwarrantably in inserting such a paragraph with a
pretence of some sort of authority for it.
It has produced an impression which strongly confirms the
observations which I took the liberty of making to your Royal
Highness on Sunday evening.
I trust, however, that my decided contradiction of the
paragraph will put a stop to further surmise and discussion on
the subject.
To Mr Borthwick's note I add one of several letters
addressed to me, which shows the proneness to speculate upon
constitutional novelties.
I have the honour to be, Sir, with sincere respect, your Royal
Highness's most faithful and obedient Servant,
ROBERT PEEL.]
_Queen Victoria to Sir Robert Peel._
WINDSOR CASTLE, _24th March 1845._
The Queen has received Sir Robert Peel's box containing his
recommendation relative to the filling up of the vacant Bishopric of
Ely. The Queen quite approves of the present Dean of Westminster[7]
as the new Bishop. As Sir Robert has asked the Queen whether she
would like to see Archdeacon Wilberforce succeed to the Deanery of
Westminster in case the Dean should accept the Bishopric, she must say
that such an arrangement would be _very satisfactory_ to us, and the
Queen believes would highly please the Archdeacon. This would again
vacate, the Queen believes, a stall at Winchester, which she would
like to see filled by a person decidedly adverse to Puseyism.
The Queen approves of the Bishop of Lichfield[8] being transferred to
the See of Ely in case Doctor Turton should decline it.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account