The Letters of S. Ambrose, Bishop of MilanAmbrose, Saint, Bishop of Milan
Religion
The Letters of S. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan
Ambrose, Saint, Bishop of Milan
Ambrose, Saint, Bishop of Milan, -397 -- Correspondence
33. Thus it was through his valour that the last day of his life was
also the sum of his victories, and that he met not a captive but a
triumphant end. But to have been entrapped by a woman is to be ascribed
to nature rather than to the man, because it was by the condition of
his humanity more than through his own fault that he fell; for this
is wont to be overcome, and yield to the allurements of wickedness.
Wherefore, since Scripture bears witness that he slew more in his
death than while in the light of life, it would seem that his captivity
happened rather for the destruction of his adversaries than for his own
fall and humiliation. For he whose burial was more efficacious than his
living strength cannot be said to have found himself inferior. Lastly,
he was overwhelmed and buried not by the weapons but by the bodies of
his enemies, and thus, covered by his own triumph, he left a glorious
memorial to posterity. For he judged his countrymen, whom he found
enslaved, twenty years, and buried in his native soil, left them
inheritors of liberty.
34. By this example then it is plain that alliances with strangers
should be avoided, lest through love for our wife the snares of
treachery should be successful.
Farewell and love us, as we love you.
LETTER XX.
A.D. 385.
AFTER the death of Gratian the empire of the West was nominally
in the hands of Valentinian the 2nd, but, as he was a mere boy,
the real power was exercised by his mother Justina, who was an
Arian. S. Ambrose had already resisted her successfully in the
question of the election of a Bishop at Sirmium (see Footnote
27), and although he had performed a difficult and dangerous
service for them two years before this, in going on an embassy
to Maximus after the death of Gratian, Justina and Valentinian
were bitterly hostile to him, and supported the Arian faction
against him. In March, A.D. 385, S. Ambrose was summoned to
the Palace, as he himself relates in the Sermon of which he
gives an account in this letter (§ 15 sqq.) and called upon to
give up one of the Churches, the Portian Basilica, outside the
walls, for the use of the Arians. This he refused, and was so
energetically supported by the people of Milan, that the demand
was for the time withdrawn. Various other efforts were then
made either to induce him to yield or to get him out of the way,
(one of the latter is recounted in a note on the Sermon against
Auxentius § 15) but they all failed. At last on the Friday
before Palm Sunday a fresh demand is made, not for the Portian
Basilica, as a promise had been given that no further claim
should be made upon it, but for the New Basilica which was
within the walls. It is at this point that the narrative which
S. Ambrose gives in this letter to his sister Marcellina begins.
It recounts the occurrences from the Friday to the Wednesday in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account