The Letters of the Duke of Wellington to Miss J., 1834-1851: Edited, with Extracts from the Diary of the Latter — John Shaqi
The Letters of the Duke of Wellington to Miss J., 1834-1851: Edited, with Extracts from the Diary of the LatterWellington, Arthur Wellesley, Duke of
History
The Letters of the Duke of Wellington to Miss J., 1834-1851: Edited, with Extracts from the Diary of the Latter
Wellington, Arthur Wellesley, Duke of
Wellington, Arthur Wellesley, Duke of, 1769-1852 -- Correspondence
In all these Cases particularly those in which High Personages
are concerned Prudence requires that those who advise should look
a little farther than the one Case under consideration.
Believe me, Ever Yours
Most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"By the Duke's next letter I presume I had dated one to him wrongly
as he writes: 'I have received and perused with attention your
letter dated the 29th, I conclude by mistake, for which I return my
best thanks.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Aug. 31st, below which he
again addresses me on Sept. 1st thus. 'Since writing the above my
dear Miss J., I have received your letter of the 31st of Aug. There
is no post from home today and you will not receive this
acknowledgment of its receipt and thanks for it until Monday.'
"The next letter from the Duke is dated Sept. 11th in which he
writes; 'I am not capable, I am sorry to acknowledge, of entering
on a discussion on the topics in your letter'--and in his next of
Sept. the 12th he writes; 'I can read your letters perfectly. I
wish that I understood the subjects to which they relate
sufficiently to be able to answer them.'"
WALMER CASTLE, Sept. 15, 1838.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have just now received two Letters from you,
both finished on the 12^th for which I return my thanks. One of
them contained the Pen wipers for which I am much obliged to you.
The Story in the Newspapers about my having been consulted by the
Queen about D^r Hook's Sermon is entirely false. There is no
foundation whatever for it.
As far as I can Judge from the accounts that I have seen the
Queen did not notice D^r Hook's Sermon in any of the Modes
supposed and stated. [Endnote 1]
I am very much obliged to you for your Enquiries about my
lameness. I thank God! I have entirely recovered from it.
Believe me Ever Yours most faithfully
WELLINGTON.
"I need not say it rejoices _me_ to behold _thanks_ given to _Him_
from whom all blessings flow.
"A. J.
"The Duke's next letter is dated Sept. 16th in which he writes;
'There is no post from the country on Saturday as there is no
Delivery in London on Sunday, so you will receive both letters
therefore tomorrow, possibly at the same time.' The next from the
Duke is dated Sept. 20th in which he writes 'I hope that you will
soon recover from your indisposition,' and in that of the 23rd he
writes; 'I assure you that I was aware that you had reason to
believe that the story respecting the Queen was true.' The Duke
means 'was not true' for he had referred to this subject in some
letter just passed through my hands.
"On Sept. the 25th 1838 the Duke writes to thank me for my letters
adding 'But you do not mention your health and I hope that you have
entirely recovered from your indisposition.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account