The Library of Work and Play: HousekeepingGilman, Elizabeth Hale
General
The Library of Work and Play: Housekeeping
Gilman, Elizabeth Hale
Home economics
The problem, as you must personally meet it, unsolved, unclassified,
little understood and a good deal discouraging is even now perhaps
getting dinner in the kitchen. Probably the best plan for dealing with
her at present is to use a little of both systems. It is wise to be
very business-like about some things. "Days out," for instance, ought
not to be interfered with except in case of family calamity. If the
maid chooses to spend them at home, they should be as much hers as
if she had gone out. Sanitary surroundings are another thing. I hope
that if I looked into your maids' room I should not see that there was
no light, no heat, a double bed for two maids who are strangers to
each other and the most meagre washing conveniences. It is useless to
say that it is better than their homes, it is not their homes, it is
_your home_. When an inspector goes to see about factory conditions,
he does not say, "It's well enough, it's as good as their homes."
Another thing about which we should be business-like is the matter of
hours. We should be as particular that our maids do not work sixteen
hours as if we had a Trades' Union compelling us to be. A business-like
point-of-view would also preserve us from despising a necessary and
useful occupation. I have mentioned the careless way we speak of it
sometimes, but what I think really matters more, is that some women
would rather put up with lying, stealing, and immorality in a maid
than take the risk of having to do her work. On the maid's "day out,"
likewise, some of us do as little of her work and do it as slightingly
as we can, and she knows it.
But we shall need the patriarchal method in dealing with maids
personally. They are of many nationalities; they are untrained,
untaught; they have different customs, different manners, often
different feelings from ourselves. We shall need much knowledge and
human sympathy to understand them; much patience and quietness to teach
them. We shall have to explain things which are new to them a great
many times and very simply. We shall have to tell them definitely a few
things which we require, and we must keep them and ourselves faithfully
to these requirements. We must not lose our tempers with them because
this lessens our authority, and besides, it is inexcusable to lose
one's temper with a subordinate. We must not expect sympathy from them
in the trouble they give us. We shall not get it any more than we would
get such sympathy from children in school.
It is sometimes a help over a puzzling place to remember that this work
has a resemblance to the work of teaching. There is required of us
the same willingness to wait long for results, the same patience with
ignorance and clumsiness and defectiveness, the same quiet firmness
toward carelessness and insolence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account