The Library of Work and Play: HousekeepingGilman, Elizabeth Hale
General
The Library of Work and Play: Housekeeping
Gilman, Elizabeth Hale
Home economics
Many teachers have to begin to teach when they still know very little.
They learn as they work, and so can housekeeper teachers. If the cook
knows more about her work than you do, by all means learn from her and
take her advice often, but do not allow her on this account to rule the
household, or to decide about family arrangements which are not in her
department.
Do you know that letter of Saint Paul's written to his friend Philemon
on behalf of a runaway slave? It is an irresistible letter. Such a
mingling of loving confidence and insistent authority is hardly to be
found elsewhere. And also, with a little thinking, a little putting
together piece by piece, one gets a whole, vivid dramatic story from
this letter.
But its importance to us is that it is a letter written about a
servant, and has more in it than people have yet been able to put into
practice, though they have made a little progress in about nineteen
hundred years.
XVII
MARTHA
I BELIEVE that the chief reason that women find the work of
housekeeping irksome and sometimes intolerable is a reason seldom given
or reckoned with. The objections frequently raised, that women dislike
the work because it ties them at home, because it takes all their time,
because it tires them so that they can do nothing else, are obviously
inadequate.
For why should it not do all these things? Lawyers, doctors and
teachers give all their time and thought to their work; nurses,
companions and secretaries do not have much time to go out; women who
stand behind counters, tend looms or sit at switchboards are often too
tired even for pleasure when the day's work is done. A woman who earns
her part of the family living by making a home cannot expect to be
delivered from toil. Is it likely that she can succeed in a difficult
profession without giving up pleasures and ease for its sake, without
working as hard and as unquestioningly as the men of her family do for
their part of the family support?
Some people say that we regard the profession of housekeeping
unreasonably because women are by nature lazy, frivolous, and not
capable of very much intellectually. Now, though I humbly acknowledge
that these things may have to do with it, yet I believe, as was at
first suggested, that there is a chief reason for the serious distaste
we often feel for the profession. This reason is, that a certain
reticence and effacement, which every one should exercise in regard to
his work, is required of housekeepers in unusual measure.
People who can think and talk of nothing but their own work and
interests are very difficult people; a housekeeper who has this fault
is not only difficult, she is dangerous. For women who make their
housekeeping an idol pretty soon begin to offer it human sacrifice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account