The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 1 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.Fagan, Louis
History
The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 1 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.
Fagan, Louis
Panizzi, Anthony, Sir, 1797-1879
By this time the list of candidates for the Queen’s hand had been
considerably reduced. There remained but two within the _principle of
the descendants of Philip V._, the Duke of Cadiz, and his brother, Don
Enrique, Duke of Seville. To the last of these, Lord Palmerston, but
simply as an outsider, gave the preference, as _the only Spanish Prince
who is fit, by his personal qualities, to be the Queen’s husband_. Don
Enrique, however, was a little too liberal and progressive in his
principles to be accepted by the opposite party. Finally, after a long
course of unseemly manœuvring and double-dealing, the marriage of
Queen Isabella with Francis, Duke of Cadiz, was brought about, and at
the same time, by a violation of good faith, such as blushing history
has seldom had to record, the Duke de Montpensier’s marriage with the
Infanta took place.
An excellent commentary on the various phases of this wretched intrigue,
and on the conduct of those concerned in it, will be found in the
subjoined correspondence between Thiers and Panizzi. In answer to the
charges brought by the latter against Guizot, Thiers replies with very
summary treatment of the French Minister, both politically and
personally. The sketch of Louis-Philippe’s character, in the first
quoted of these letters, is admirably drawn. The policy, however, of the
great monarch of the barricades, made up of audacity and cunning, was on
the whole so skilfully conducted, though so little likely to be
enduring, as to our mind to justify a more significant epithet than that
of a mere umpire.
What, however, stands out most conspicuously in this same letter is the
sound, practical, and commonsense view taken by Thiers of the claim to
actual and substantial importance of the _Spanish Marriages_; his
justification of the British Cabinet’s policy of non-interference (and,
with it, of Lord Aberdeen’s conduct) in a matter in no wise vital to
England; and his far-sighted estimate of what might have been the
consequences to Europe had more serious measures in opposition to the
plot been adopted. It would have been an evil day that had seen the four
greatest European powers ranged in two directly opposite, if not,
indeed, openly hostile camps; whereof England and Prussia should have
occupied the one, and France and Austria the other. The _Spanish
Marriages_ was a comedy, and decidedly unworthy of exaltation, at least
for the time being, to the rank of an European tragedy.
[Illustration: F.P.G. Guizot]
“Paris, le 12 Janvier, 1847.
“Mon cher Panizzi,
Je veux depuis longtemps vous écrire, mais je suis enfoncé dans
mon travail d’impression qui ne m’en laisse pas le temps. Je quitte ce
travail pour les discussions de la Chambre, et je vous donne les
premiers moments de cette diversion. Il n’y a rien ici de nouveau,
mais je n’en veux pas moins vous dire quelques mots de la situation.
Auparavant, voici mon avis sur les pièces que j’ai lues.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account