The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.Romanes, George John
Science
The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.
Romanes, George John
Naturalists -- Great Britain -- Biography; Romanes, George John, 1848-1894
Lawson Tait says (p. 60)--'The process of growth of the ovum
after impregnation can be followed only after the assumption
either expressed or _unconsciously accepted_ of such a hypothesis
as is contained in Mr. Darwin's "Pangenesis;"' and it is
interesting, as showing the truth of the remark, to compare,
for example, p. 29 of the other pamphlet--for, of course,
'Pangenesis' assumes the truth of the persistence of force as
the prime condition of its possibility. If ever I have occasion
to prepare a paper about heredity, I think it would be worth
while to point out the absurdity of thinking that we explain
anything by vague allusions to the most ultimate generalisation
of science. We might just as well say that Canadian institutions
resemble British ones because force is persistent. This
doubtless is the ultimate reason, but our explanation would be
scientifically valueless if we neglected to observe that the
Canadian colony was founded by British individuals.
The leaf from 'Nature' arrived last night. I had previously
intended to try mangold-wurzel, as I hear it has well-marked
varieties. The reference, therefore, will be valuable to me.
Before closing, I should like to take this opportunity of
thanking you again for the very pleasant time I spent at Down.
The place was one which I had long wished to see, and now that
I have seen it, I am sure it will ever remain one of the most
agreeable and interesting of memory's pictures.
With kind regards to Mrs. Darwin, I remain, very sincerely and
most respectfully yours,
GEO. J. ROMANES.
_To Professor E. Schäfer._
Dunskaith, Ross-shire.
My dear Schäfer,--I am glad to hear that your rest has been
beneficial, and also about all the other news you give.
I should like to have your opinion about the meaning of the
following facts.
In Sarsia gentle irritation of a tentacle or an eye-speck causes
the _polypite_ to respond, but not the bell (stronger irritation,
of course, causes both to respond); this seems to show that there
are nervous connections between the eye-specks and the polypite.
By introducing cuts between former and latter, these connections
may be destroyed--the tolerance of the tissue to such sections
being variable in different cases, but never being anything
remarkable. So far, then, the matter seems favourable to the
nerve-plexus theory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account