You must be informed then, that _Gastripheres_, who had taken a turn
into the kitchen a little before dinner, to see how things went
on—observing a wicker-basket of fine chesnuts standing upon the
dresser, had ordered that a hundred or two of them might be roasted and
sent in, as soon as dinner was over— _Gastripheres_ inforcing his
orders about them, that _Didius_, but _Phutatorius_ especially, were
particularly fond of ’em.
About two minutes before the time that my uncle _Toby_ interrupted
_Yorick_’s harangue—_Gastripheres_’s chesnuts were brought in—and as
_Phutatorius_’s fondness for ’em was uppermost in the waiter’s head, he
laid them directly before _Phutatorius_, wrapt up hot in a clean damask
napkin.
Now whether it was physically impossible, with half a dozen hands all
thrust into the napkin at a time—but that some one chesnut, of more
life and rotundity than the rest, must be put in motion—it so fell out,
however, that one was actually sent rolling off the table; and as
_Phutatorius_ sat straddling under——it fell perpendicularly into that
particular aperture of _Phutatorius_’s breeches, for which, to the
shame and indelicacy of our language be it spoke, there is no chaste
word throughout all _Johnson_’s dictionary——let it suffice to say——it
was that particular aperture which, in all good societies, the laws of
decorum do strictly require, like the temple of _Janus_ (in peace at
least) to be universally shut up.
The neglect of this punctilio in _Phutatorius_ (which by-the-bye should
be a warning to all mankind) had opened a door to this accident.——
Accident I call it, in compliance to a received mode of speaking——but
in no opposition to the opinion either of _Acrites_ or _Mythogeras_ in
this matter; I know they were both prepossessed and fully persuaded of
it—and are so to this hour, That there was nothing of accident in the
whole event——but that the chesnut’s taking that particular course, and
in a manner of its own accord—and then falling with all its heat
directly into that one particular place, and no other——was a real
judgment upon _Phutatorius_ for that filthy and obscene treatise _de
Concubinis retinendis_, which _Phutatorius_ had published about twenty
years ago——and was that identical week going to give the world a second
edition of.
It is not my business to dip my pen in this controversy——much
undoubtedly may be wrote on both sides of the question—all that
concerns me as an historian, is to represent the matter of fact, and
render it credible to the reader, that the hiatus in _Phutatorius_’s
breeches was sufficiently wide to receive the chesnut;——and that the
chesnut, somehow or other, did fall perpendicularly, and piping hot
into it, without _Phutatorius_’s perceiving it, or any one else at that
time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account