’Tis either _Plato_, or _Plutarch_, or _Seneca_, or _Xenophon_, or
_Epictetus_, or _Theophrastus_, or _Lucian_—or some one perhaps of
later date—either _Cardan_, or _Budæus_, or _Petrarch_, or _Stella_—or
possibly it may be some divine or father of the church, St. _Austin_,
or St. _Cyprian_, or _Barnard_, who affirms that it is an irresistible
and natural passion to weep for the loss of our friends or children—and
_Seneca_ (I’m positive) tells us somewhere, that such griefs evacuate
themselves best by that particular channel—And accordingly we find,
that _David_ wept for his son _Absalom_—_Adrian_ for his
_Antinous_—_Niobe_ for her children, and that _Apollodorus_ and _Crito_
both shed tears for _Socrates_ before his death.
My father managed his affliction otherwise; and indeed differently from
most men either ancient or modern; for he neither wept it away, as the
_Hebrews_ and the _Romans_—or slept it off, as the _Laplanders_—or
hanged it, as the _English_, or drowned it, as the _Germans_,—nor did
he curse it, or damn it, or excommunicate it, or rhyme it, or
lillabullero it.——
——He got rid of it, however.
Will your worships give me leave to squeeze in a story between these
two pages?
When _Tully_ was bereft of his dear daughter _Tullia_, at first he laid
it to his heart,—he listened to the voice of nature, and modulated his
own unto it.—O my _Tullia!_ my daughter! my child!—still, still,
still,—’twas O my _Tullia!_—my _Tullia!_ Methinks I see my _Tullia_, I
hear my _Tullia_, I talk with my _Tullia._—But as soon as he began to
look into the stores of philosophy, and consider how many excellent
things might be said upon the occasion—no body upon earth can conceive,
says the great orator, how happy, how joyful it made me.
My father was as proud of his eloquence as MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO could
be for his life, and, for aught I am convinced of to the contrary at
present, with as much reason: it was indeed his strength—and his
weakness too.——His strength—for he was by nature eloquent; and his
weakness—for he was hourly a dupe to it; and, provided an occasion in
life would but permit him to shew his talents, or say either a wise
thing, a witty, or a shrewd one—(bating the case of a systematic
misfortune)—he had all he wanted.—A blessing which tied up my father’s
tongue, and a misfortune which let it loose with a good grace, were
pretty equal: sometimes, indeed, the misfortune was the better of the
two; for instance, where the pleasure of the harangue was as _ten_, and
the pain of the misfortune but as _five_—my father gained half in half,
and consequently was as well again off, as if it had never befallen
him.
This clue will unravel what otherwise would seem very inconsistent in
my father’s domestic character; and it is this, that, in the
provocations arising from the neglects and blunders of servants, or
other mishaps unavoidable in a family, his anger, or rather the
duration of it, eternally ran counter to all conjecture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account