Whether this was the case of the singularity of my father’s notions—or
that his judgment, at length, became the dupe of his wit;—or how far,
in many of his notions, he might, though odd, be absolutely right;—the
reader, as he comes at them, shall decide. All that I maintain here,
is, that in this one, of the influence of christian names, however it
gained footing, he was serious;—he was all uniformity;—he was
systematical, and, like all systematic reasoners, he would move both
heaven and earth, and twist and torture every thing in nature to
support his hypothesis. In a word I repeat it over again;—he was
serious;—and, in consequence of it, he would lose all kind of patience
whenever he saw people, especially of condition, who should have known
better,——as careless and as indifferent about the name they imposed
upon their child,—or more so, than in the choice of _Ponto_ or _Cupid_
for their puppy-dog.
This, he would say, look’d ill;—and had, moreover, this particular
aggravation in it, viz. That when once a vile name was wrongfully or
injudiciously given, ’twas not like the case of a man’s character,
which, when wrong’d, might hereafter be cleared;——and, possibly, some
time or other, if not in the man’s life, at least after his death,—be,
somehow or other, set to rights with the world: But the injury of this,
he would say, could never be undone;—nay, he doubted even whether an
act of parliament could reach it:——He knew as well as you, that the
legislature assumed a power over surnames;—but for very strong reasons,
which he could give, it had never yet adventured, he would say, to go a
step farther.
It was observable, that tho’ my father, in consequence of this opinion,
had, as I have told you, the strongest likings and dislikings towards
certain names;—that there were still numbers of names which hung so
equally in the balance before him, that they were absolutely
indifferent to him. _Jack, Dick_, and _Tom_ were of this class: These
my father called neutral names;—affirming of them, without a satire,
That there had been as many knaves and fools, at least, as wise and
good men, since the world began, who had indifferently borne them;—so
that, like equal forces acting against each other in contrary
directions, he thought they mutually destroyed each other’s effects;
for which reason, he would often declare, He would not give a
cherry-stone to choose amongst them. _Bob_, which was my brother’s
name, was another of these neutral kinds of christian names, which
operated very little either way; and as my father happen’d to be at
_Epsom_, when it was given him,—he would oft-times thank Heaven it was
no worse. _Andrew_ was something like a negative quantity in Algebra
with him;—’twas worse, he said, than nothing.—_William_ stood pretty
high:——_Numps_ again was low with him:—and _Nick_, he said, was the
DEVIL.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account