The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 1 (of 3): From original and authentic sourcesThomson, A. T., Mrs.
History
The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 1 (of 3): From original and authentic sources
Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
Buckingham, George Villiers, Duke of, 1592-1628
Footnote 224:
Inedited State Papers. It is dated, London, March 11, 1619-20.
The following extract from one of Mr. Chamberlain’s letters represents
another kind of diversion:—“The King came hither the Saturday before
Shrovetide, and the two days following there was much feasting and
jollity; and the Christmas mask repeated on Shrove Tuesday night. On
Saturday last, the Prince made a ball and a banquet at Denmark House,
which he had lost at Tennis to the Marquis of Buckingham,[225] who
invited thither a number of ladies, mistresses, and valentines, a
ceremony come lately in request, and grown so costly that it is said he
hath cast away this year 2000_l._ that way, among whom a daughter of Sir
John Croft’s that is unmarried, had a carcanet of 800_l._ for her share;
and the King is so pleased with the whole society of those sisters,[226]
that he extols them before all others, and hath bespoken them for the
Court against next Christmas. The banquet at Denmark House was so
plentiful that it cost 400_l._, and all the women came away, as it were,
laden with sweetmeats; but supper there was none, save what the Lord of
Purbeck made to his private friends.”[227]
Footnote 225:
Inedited State Papers, Feb. 26, 1619-20.
Footnote 226:
Sir J. Croft’s Daughters.
Footnote 227:
N. Brent to Sir D. Carleton, March 30, 1618. State Paper Office,
inedited.
Another of those aspirants to royal favour, to whom we have referred,
and whom the career of Buckingham drew forth from obscurity, was Sir
Henry Mildmay, and a son of George Brooke’s, who had been executed at
Winchester, on the supposed Raleigh plot. But James soon discovered that
both these young courtiers were the tools of factions directed against
Buckingham; and they were banished the Court. Some time afterwards, it
was thought that the return of young Monson might be effected through
the influence of his friends; but, observes a bystander of this game,
these Court resolutions do strangely alter, and for the most part, “the
day following gives the lie to that which preceded.”
The King, meantime, continued to amuse himself vastly at Newmarket. The
following description of one of his days of pleasure presents a singular
picture of the homely diversions of the first of the Stuart monarchs
that reigned in this country:—
“We hear nothing from Newmarket, but that they devise all the means they
can to make themselves merry, as of late there was a feast appointed at
a farm-house not far off, where every man should bring his dish. The
King brought a great chine of beef; the Marquis of Hamilton four pigs,
garnished with sausages; the Earl of Southampton two turkies; another,
some partridges; and one, a whole tray full of buttered eggs: and so all
passed very pleasantly.”[228]
Footnote 228:
Mr. Chamberlain to Sir Dudley Carleton, Nov. 28, 1618. State Paper
Office, inedited.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account