The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 3 (of 3): From original and authentic sourcesThomson, A. T., Mrs.
History
The life and times of George Villiers, duke of Buckingham, Volume 3 (of 3): From original and authentic sources
Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
Buckingham, George Villiers, Duke of, 1592-1628
There was so close an intimacy at one time between the Earl of
Pembroke’s family and that of the Duke of Buckingham, that it seems
strange that no trace of Massinger’s having been patronized by him
are to be discovered. In fact, the annals of Massinger’s life
present little except the dates of his works. The eldest son of the
unworthy Philip, Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery, the poet’s chief
patron, was married in 1634 to Lady Mary Villiers, then a mere girl.
It is true that this alliance was formed six years after
Buckingham’s death; but it was probably concerted before that event,
after the fashion of the day, in which the infant in the cradle was
often affianced by ambitious parents, and the nuptials solemnized at
ten or twelve years of age. Charles, Lord Herbert set out on his
travels directly after he had married his young wife, and died of
small-pox at Florence in 1636. Massinger wrote a poem on his loss,
among others, to his little bride:--
“True sorrow fell
With showers of tears--still bathe the widowed bed
Of his dear spouse.”
The elegy, as it has been observed, had better not have been
written; and his “dear spouse” very likely at that time preferred
balls and revelries to her husband.
It was, however, not impossible that Villiers, to please the Herbert
family, may have been the means of introducing Massinger to Charles
I., who justly estimated his great merits, and proved a more
generous as well as a worthier patron than the Earl of Pembroke and
Montgomery.
The political tenets of Massinger brought him on one occasion into
considerable danger. They were, nevertheless, such as we should now
term moderate; but they were irrelevantly introduced into his
dramas, at a time when liberalism was almost regarded as next to
treason. In 1631, Sir Henry Herbert, the Master of the Revels,
refused to receive a play of Massinger’s because it contained what
that functionary called “dangerous matters,” as to the deposing of
Sebastian, King of Portugal, and “thereby reflected upon Spain.”
Even the name of that piece is unknown, although the Master of the
Revels took care that the fee of twenty shillings for reading it
over was paid to him. In 1638, when the question of the Ship-money
was dividing the nation from the Court, Massinger, unable to control
his indignation at the oppressive measures of Charles I., produced
another play, called “The King and the Subject,” founded on the
history of Don Pedro the Cruel. It contained, amongst other free and
bold passages, these lines:--
“Monies? We’ll raise supplies which way we please,
And force you to subscribe to blanks, in which
We’ll mulct you as we shall think fit. The Cæsars
In Rome were wise, acknowledging no laws
But what their swords did ratify--the wives
And daughters of the senators bowing to
Their will as deities----”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account