The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 3 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 3 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
The domestic policy of the Government was not of much interest in 1863.
Very early in the Session Mr. Gladstone introduced his Budget. The
American War had sent the price of cotton up from 7d. to 2s. 1d. a
pound, and trade was prostrate and stagnant in Lancashire. The
agricultural wealth of Ireland from 1856 to 1860 had been, on the
average, about £39,437,000[166] a year. But in 1863 it had fallen to
£27,327,000--a decrease of £12,000,000, a sum not far short of the
established annual valuation of the country, which was but £13,000,000.
Ireland and Lancashire ought therefore to have made havoc with Mr.
Gladstone’s estimates for the past year. So far from that being the
case, the revenue, under the expansive influence of Free Trade, had
risen to £67,790,000, or £805,000 over the estimates.[167] The
expenditure had been £69,302,000, or £806,000 less than the estimates.
For the coming year Mr. Gladstone accordingly estimated a revenue of
£71,490,000 on the existing basis. Hence he had in view a surplus of
£3,741,000, so that he saw his way to lessen the pressure of taxation on
the people. He therefore reduced the Income Tax from 9d. to 7d. in the
pound, readjusting its incidence so as to give more relief to small
incomes. He reduced the tea duty to 1s. in the pound, and equalised the
duties on chicory and coffee, but his attempts to levy Income Tax on
public charities and trust corporations were defeated[168] after a
somewhat acrid controversy. Mr. Gladstone’s argument was that their
corrupt management really deprived most of the rich incorporated
charities of a right to an appeal _ad misericordium_. He, however,
pressed his point too far. His lurid picture of their administrative
abuses tempted people to doubt whether the penal imposition of a
sevenpenny Income Tax was the best means of dealing with such gigantic
evils.
The lamented death of Sir George Cornewall Lewis in April not only
brought confusion into the Cabinet, but it deprived the Queen of a
valued
[Illustration: GENERAL GRANT.]
friend, whose services she could ill afford to lose. “To me, dear Lady
Theresa,” the Queen says in a letter to Sir George’s widow (15th April),
“this is a heavy loss, a severe blow! My own darling had the very
highest esteem, regard, and respect for dear Sir Cornewall Lewis; we
delighted in his society; we admired his great honesty and fearless
straightforwardness. We had the greatest confidence in him, and since my
terrible misfortune, I clung particularly to characters like his, which
are so rare. I felt he was a friend, and I looked to him as a support,
and a wise and safe counsellor. He is snatched away, and his loss to me
and to the country is irreparable. How little did I think, when I talked
to him the last time here, and he spoke so kindly of my popularity, as
he so kindly expressed it, that I should never see his kind face
again.”[169] He was leader of “the Court Party” in the Cabinet, and was
succeeded at the War Office by Earl de Grey.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account