The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 3 of 4 — John Shaqi
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 3 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 3 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
temper of the English people was such as to render it impossible, after
what had been said on both sides, to proceed with Lord Palmerston’s
Bill. Moreover, Lord John Russell and Mr. Gladstone had put themselves
at the head of 140 Members pledged to use all the forms of the House of
Commons for the purpose of obstructing any measure of the sort, and the
case was one where obstruction by keeping open a sore between two
nations would soon render it an unhealable wound.[19] As for Walewski’s
despatch, Mr. Milner Gibson’s motion had censured Lord Palmerston’s
Government for not answering it, so Lord Palmerston’s successors, who
had supported that motion, were bound to reply to it. Their difficulties
were complicated by the foolish behaviour of De Persigny, the French
Ambassador. He was a strong partisan of Palmerston’s, and he went about
London drawing-rooms denouncing the Tory Government in the most violent
terms. Nay, he made a practice of communicating to Lord Palmerston
everything which passed between himself and Lord Malmesbury in their
official conversations, and Lord Palmerston did not scruple to use
information obtained by this dishonourable violation of diplomatic
rules; nor did he shrink from making himself De Persigny’s accomplice in
these questionable transactions. Lord Malmesbury felt himself so
completely embarrassed by such proceedings that he caused Lord Cowley to
privately inform the French Emperor that he must in future decline to
transact business through De Persigny. Lord Malmesbury said plainly,
that he must communicate directly through Lord Cowley or Count Walewski
in Paris, for De Persigny at this time not only carried his confidential
conversation to Palmerston, but Palmerston actually instructed him how
to embarrass the English Government in attempting to resist dictatorial
pressure from France. Lord Malmesbury’s spirited protest was well-timed
and highly effective.[20] Acting through Lord Cowley, Lord Malmesbury
arranged with Count Walewski a form of reply to the despatch which would
adequately meet the demands of the English people, and yet give the
French Government an opportunity of honourably repudiating any intention
of wounding British susceptibilities. On hearing of this, Persigny, who
had pledged himself to restore Palmerston to power by forcing the Tory
Government to pass the Conspiracy Bill in a week, resigned. To his
surprise and disgust his resignation was accepted, and Marshal
Pélissier, Duke of Malakoff, was sent to England in his place. This was
another triumph for the Tory Ministry, because Palmerston had reckoned
on Walewski appointing Moustier, French Ambassador at Berlin, to the
Court of St. James’s when Persigny resigned, and as Moustier was, like
Walewski, virtually a Russian agent, fresh troubles would soon have been
manufactured for Lord Malmesbury. Napoleon III., however, insisted on
sending a personal representative, who from his Crimean services would
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account