The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
But the Ministerial newspapers heaped obloquy on Lord Carnarvon,
declaring that he merely spoke for himself; and at a Cabinet Meeting
on the 3rd of January there was quite a “scene” between him and Lord
Beaconsfield. The Prime Minister condemned the speech of his colleague,
who, however, put on a bold front, and read a Memorandum before the
Cabinet vindicating his position, and re-affirming everything that
he had said. Lord Beaconsfield merely asked him for a copy of this
document, and no Minister then or at any subsequent period hinted
at a private or public disavowal of Lord Carnarvon’s statement. A
very conciliatory answer was sent on the 12th of January to Prince
Gortschakoff. It did not even suggest that the temporary military
occupation of Constantinople would endanger British interests, but it
asked Russia not to touch Gallipoli. On the 15th of January Prince
Gortschakoff answered that Russia would not occupy Gallipoli unless
Turkish troops were massed there; but he said that a British occupation
of the Peninsula would be regarded by Russia as a breach of neutrality.
On the 17th of January Parliament met, and, to its surprise, found
itself greeted with a Royal Speech couched in the most dove-like terms
of peace. The War Party were abashed. Even Lord Beaconsfield spoke not
of daggers, though he hinted vaguely at the chances of using them.
There was also a clause in the Queen’s Speech which, after admitting
that none of the conditions of British neutrality had been violated,
alluded darkly to the possibility of something occurring which might
render “measures of precaution” necessary. Lord Salisbury, however,
went out of his way to state that the Czar, so far from having
aggressive designs, had shown himself anxious to defer to the wishes of
Europe, and was possessed with “an almost tormenting desire for peace,”
so that Members went about asking each other--Why had Parliament been
summoned so soon, to the great disturbance of business and the alarm of
the nation, merely to be told that everything was going on smoothly?
The fact is, that it had been Lord Beaconsfield’s original intention to
send the Fleet to the Dardanelles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account