The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 4 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
and most influential recruit never spoke in public without showing
that, when he did not abandon his principles, he was at variance with
his colleagues? Various rumours were current as to a conflict of
opinion on the subject between Mr. Gladstone and his colleagues and the
Queen. Ultimately it was decided that there should be no dissolution
before spring.
Worn with anxiety, irritated by the failure of his plans for recovering
popularity through a reconstruction of his Cabinet, sick in body and
mind, the Prime Minister in January fell seriously ill. A fortnight
before the opening of the Session he paralysed his Party with amazement
by deciding to dissolve Parliament. Seldom has so momentous a decision
been arrived at in circumstances so strange and so peculiar. Writing
to Lord Salisbury on the 26th of January, 1874, Mr. Hayward says:
“Alderson (whom I saw yesterday) thought it unlikely that you would be
brought back earlier than you intended by the Dissolution, which has
come on every one by surprise. The thought first struck Gladstone as he
lay rolled up in blankets to perspire away his cold, was mentioned as
a thought to daughter and private secretary, then rapidly ripened into
a resolution and submitted to the Cabinet. The secret was wonderfully
well kept by everybody. The Liberals are delighted, and the Disraelites
puzzled and amazed.”[63]
Parliament was dissolved on the 20th of January, and it was reckoned
that the new House of Commons would be elected by St. Valentine’s
Day. Mr. Gladstone’s Address to the electors of Greenwich set forth
at great length the reasons for his sudden appeal to the country. But
Mr. Forster gave the best and briefest explanation, when he told his
constituents at Bradford that the Dissolution was due to the petty
defeats and humiliations which the Government had suffered since
Mr. Disraeli’s refusal to relieve them of the cares of office, and
to a desire that the electors should decide whether Mr. Disraeli or
Mr. Gladstone should have the spending of the enormous surplus of
£6,000,000 at the disposal of the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Mr.
Gladstone in his declarations of policy referred to the Ashanti War as
a warning against “equivocal and entangling engagements.” He complained
that the House of Commons was overburdened with work, and, with an eye
to the Irish vote, he approved of delegating some of its business to
“local and subordinate authorities” under the “unquestioned control”
of Parliament. He held out no hopes of effecting any great changes in
the Education Act, but he promised a measure of University Reform,
supported the extension of Household Franchise to the Counties, and
pledged himself to abolish the Income Tax. His meagre references to
Foreign Affairs seemed to show that Mr. Bright had forced the Cabinet
to accept the unpopular policy of selfish and self-contained isolation,
which virtually ignored the higher international duties of England as
one of the brotherhood of European nations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account