The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 2 (of 3) — John Shaqi
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 2 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
History
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 2 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
The principle was reiterated, that, wherever they preached, they should
form societies. They were to visit the poor members of society as
much as the rich. Every alternate society-meeting in London, Bristol,
Kingswood, and Newcastle, was to be kept inviolably private. At the
other meetings strangers might be admitted with caution. It was
thought, that they were in danger of making too long prayers, and it
was agreed that, though exceptional cases must arise, yet, in general,
they would do well not to pray in public above eight or ten minutes
at a time. Directions were given to the assistants to guard against
jealousy and envy, and against despising each other’s gifts. They were
to try to avoid popularity, that is, “the gaining a greater degree of
esteem or love from the people than is for the glory of God.” They were
to examine the leaders of classes, and were to send to the Wesleys a
circumstantial account of every remarkable conversion, and of every
triumphant death. Assisted by the stewards, they were, every Easter, to
make exact lists of all the members in each of the nine circuits into
which the societies were divided, and to send the lists to the ensuing
conference.[7]
In addition to these matters, there was another debated, of great
interest and importance. Five years before, Wesley had published his
“Thoughts on Marriage and Celibacy,” in which, to say the least, he
strongly commended a single life. His brother Charles was now courting
Miss Sarah Gwynne, and wished to marry her. Charles writes:—“How know
I, whether it be best for me to marry, or no? Certainly better now
than later; and, if not now, what security that I shall not then? It
should be now, or not at all.” This was sound sense. Charles was now
forty years old, and, like a wise man, he concluded, that he must
either marry now, or never. Before he left Ireland, he communicated
his intentions to his brother; and, in the month of April, he rode to
Shoreham, and “told all his heart” to Vincent Perronet.[8] Difficulties
existed. Among others, there was his brother’s tract. The Conference
of 1747 had agreed to read all the tracts which had been published,
and to make a note of everything that was thought objectionable. The
Conference of 1748 was about to meet, and, of course, had a perfect
right to review and to revise the “Thoughts on Marriage.” The question
was introduced, and the result of the discussion upon Wesley’s mind may
be found in the following sentence from a manuscript in the British
Museum, which, though not written by Wesley, was corrected by him. “In
June, 1748, we had a conference in London. Several of our brethren then
objected to the ‘Thoughts on Marriage’; and, in a full and friendly
debate, convinced me, that a believer might marry without suffering
loss in his soul.” This was a great point gained. Charles’s courtship
proceeded; and, in April, 1749, John writes: “Saturday, April 8.—I
married my brother and Sarah Gwynne. It was a solemn day, such as
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account