The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 3 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 3 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
It was in the midst of such a state of things, that Wesley wrote
the pamphlet already mentioned. He admits that, though “cobblers,
tinkers, porters, and hackney coachmen” think themselves wise enough
“to instruct both the king and his council,” he himself is “not so
deeply learned. Politics were beyond his province; but he would use the
privilege of an Englishman to speak his naked thoughts.” “I have,” he
writes, “no bias, one way or the other. I have no interest depending.
I want no man’s favour, having no hopes, no fears, from any man.”
He then proceeds to defend the character of the king; and maintains
that, as an outlaw, Wilkes was incapacitated to take a seat in the
House of Commons. “Encumbered with no religion, and disappointed in
his application for place and power, Wilkes had set up for patriot,
vehemently inveighed against evil counsellors and grievances, and was
paid in French _louis d’or_ for his agitative services.” Wesley then
expresses the opinion that, “supposing things to take their natural
course, they must go from bad to worse; the land will become a field of
blood; and many thousands of poor Englishmen will sheathe their swords
in each other’s bowels, for the diversion of their good neighbours.
Then, either a commonwealth will ensue, or else a second Cromwell. One
must be; but it cannot be determined which,--King Wilkes, or King Mob.”
FOOTNOTES:
[1] C. Wesley’s Life, vol. ii., p. 242.
[2] _Methodist Magazine_, 1783, p. 684.
[3] _Methodist Magazine_, 1857, p. 616.
[4] “Life and Times of Countess of Huntingdon,” vol. i., p.
17.
[5] Ibid. vol. ii., p. 427.
[6] _Methodist Magazine_, 1857, p. 693.
[7] Manuscript letter.
[8] The meaning of this is, that, at least, £500 of what
the Methodists have always technically designated “The
Yearly Collection,” was, at this period, employed in
paying chapel debts. Except that for Kingswood school,
this was the only connexional collection that Wesley
had; and he strongly insisted that _every_ Methodist
should render it support. In an _unpublished_ letter,
addressed to Matthew Lowes, and dated March 11, 1762,
Wesley writes: “In the enclosed papers, (which you
may read in every society, just before you meet the
classes,) you will see the design of the general yearly
collection, to which _every_ Methodist in England is to
contribute something. If there is any who cannot give a
halfpenny a year, another will give it for him.”
[9] Wesley’s Works, vol. xii., p. 126.
[10] _Gentleman’s Magazine_, 1751, p. 179.
[11] Myles’s History.
[12] _Methodist Magazine_, 1825, p. 122; and 1829, p. 585.
[13] _Gentleman’s Magazine_, 1763, p. 463.
[14] Burslem old circuit book.
[15] Manuscript.
[16] _Methodist Magazine_, 1812, p. 534; and 1843, p. 89.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account