The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 3 (of 3)Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
The life and times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., founder of the Methodists. Vol. 3 (of 3)
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Methodism; Wesley, John, 1703-1791
In a subsequent number of the same periodical, published in the month
of May, Wesley’s minutes are attacked; the writer, “A Real Protestant,”
indignantly asking, “Are not these the very doctrines of popery, yea,
of popery unmasked? Is it not awful that 29,406 souls, who are in Mr.
Wesley’s societies, should be so dreadfully seduced from the protestant
doctrines, and deluded into a belief of the doctrines of the mother of
harlots, the whore of Babylon, the Church of Rome?”
Thus the bitter controversy proceeded. Comment would be easy; but
we prefer to let the chief actors speak; and, not to interrupt this
painful scene, proceed to give other letters bearing upon the subject,
so that the reader may have before him as full a view of the spirit and
behaviour of both parties as it is possible to furnish.
While on his way to Ireland, Wesley wrote the following to Fletcher.
“I always did, for between these thirty and forty years, clearly
assert the total fall of man, and his utter inability to do any
good of himself; the absolute necessity of the grace and Spirit
of God to raise even a good thought or desire in our hearts; the
Lord’s rewarding no work, and accepting of none, but so far as they
proceed from His preventing, convincing, and converting grace through
the Beloved; the blood and righteousness of Christ being the sole
meritorious cause of our salvation. Who is there in England, that
has asserted these things more strongly and steadily than I have
done?”[129]
The next letter, addressed to Lady Huntingdon, was occasioned by one
which her ladyship had sent to Wesley’s brother on the subject of his
minutes,[130] and was dated “Bath, June 8, 1771.” The countess brands
the minutes as “popery unmasked”; and declares that “all ought to be
deemed papists who do not disown them.” She thus concludes: “as you
have no part in this matter, I find it difficult to blame your brother
to you; while as an honest man I must pity you, as you must suffer
equal disgrace, and universal distrust, from the supposed union with
him.” Charles Wesley endorsed this unworthy letter with the words:
“Lady Huntingdon’s last; unanswered by John Wesley’s brother.”[131]
Charles Wesley doubtless communicated the contents to his brother, who
was now in Ireland; in fact, her ladyship requested him to do this: and
hence the following.
“_June 19, 1771._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account