The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.Ridpath, John Clark
History
The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.
Ridpath, John Clark
Garfield, James A. (James Abram), 1831-1881
“In the course of their deliberations upon this subject, there were
suggested seven different plans, which may be grouped under two
principal heads or classes. One group comprised all the plans for
creating the Chief Executive by means of some one of the preëxisting
political organizations of the country. First and foremost was the
proposition to authorize one or both Houses of the National
Legislature to elect the Chief Executive. Another was to confer that
power upon the governors of the States, or upon the legislatures of
the States. Another, that he should be chosen directly by the people
themselves under the laws of the States. The second group comprised
all the various plans for creating a new and separate
instrumentality for making the choice.
“At first the proposition that the Executive should be elected by
the National Legislature was received by the Convention with almost
unanimous approval; and for the reason that up to that time Congress
had done all that was done in the way of national government. It had
created the nation and led its fortunes through a thousand perils,
had declared and achieved independence, and had preserved the
liberty of the people in the midst of a great war. Though Congress
had failed to secure a firm and stable Government after the war, yet
its glory was not forgotten. As Congress had created the Union, it
was most natural that our fathers should say Congress should also
create the Chief Executive of the nation. And within two weeks after
the Convention assembled, they voted for that plan with absolute
unanimity.
“But with equal unanimity they agreed that this plan would be fatal
to the stability of the Government they were about to establish, if
they did not couple with it some provision that should make the
President’s functions independent of the power that created him. To
effect this, they provided that the President should be ineligible
for reëlection. They said it would never do to create a Chief
Executive by the voice of the National Legislature, and then allow
him to be reëlected by that same voice; for he would thus become
their creature.
“And so, from the first day of their session in May, to within five
days of its close in September, they grappled with the mighty
question. I have many times, and recently very carefully, gone
through all the records that are left to us of that great
transaction. I find that more than one-seventh of all the pages of
the Madison papers are devoted to this Samson of questions, how the
Executive should be chosen and made independent of the organization
that made the choice. This topic alone occupied more than
one-seventh of all the time of the Convention.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account