The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.Ridpath, John Clark
History
The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.
Ridpath, John Clark
Garfield, James A. (James Abram), 1831-1881
“After a long and earnest debate, after numerous votes and
reconsiderations, they were obliged utterly to abandon the plan of
creating the Chief Executive by means of the National Legislature. I
will not stop now to prove the statement by a dozen or more pungent
quotations from the masters of political science in that great
assembly, in which they declared that it would be ruinous to the
liberty of the people and to the permanence of the Republic if they
did not absolutely exclude the National Legislature from any share
in the election of the President.
“They pointed with glowing eloquence to the sad but instructive fate
of those brilliant Italian republics that were destroyed because
there was no adequate separation of powers, and because their
senates overwhelmed and swallowed up the executive power, and, as
secret and despotic conclaves, became the destroyers of Italian
liberty.
“At the close of the great discussion, when the last vote on this
subject was taken by our fathers, they were almost unanimous in
excluding the National Legislature from any share whatever in the
choice of the Chief Executive of the nation. They rejected all the
plans of the first group, and created a new instrumentality. They
adopted the system of electors. When that plan was under discussion,
they used the utmost precaution to hedge it about by every
conceivable protection against the interference or control of
Congress.
“In the first place, they said the States shall create the electoral
colleges. They allowed Congress to have nothing whatever to do with
the creation of the colleges, except merely to fix the time when the
States should appoint them. And, in order to exclude Congress by
positive prohibition, in the last days of the Convention they
provided that no member of either House of Congress should be
appointed an elector; so that not even by the personal influence of
any one of its members could the Congress interfere with the
election of a President.
“The creation of a President under our Constitution consists of
three distinct steps: First, the creation of the electoral colleges;
second, the vote of colleges; and third, the opening and counting of
their votes. This is the simple plan of the Constitution.
“The creation of the colleges is left absolutely to the States,
within the five limitations I had the honor to mention to the House
a few days ago. First, it must be a _State_ that appoints electors;
second, the State is limited as to the number of electors it may
appoint; third, electors shall not be members of Congress or
officers of the United States; fourth, the time for appointing
electors may be fixed by Congress; and, fifth, the time when their
appointment is announced, which must be before the date for giving
their votes, may also be fixed by Congress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account