The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.Ridpath, John Clark
History
The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.
Ridpath, John Clark
Garfield, James A. (James Abram), 1831-1881
“These five simple limitations, and these alone, were laid upon the
States. Every other act, fact, and thing possible to be done in
creating the electoral colleges was absolutely and uncontrollably in
the power of the States themselves. Within these limitations,
Congress has no more power to touch them in this work than England
or France. That is the first step.
“The second is still plainer and simpler, namely, the work of the
colleges. They were created as an independent and separate power, or
set of powers, for the sole purpose of electing a President. They
were created by the States. Congress has just one thing to do with
them, and only one: it may fix the day when they shall meet. By the
act of 1792 Congress fixed the day as it still stands in the law;
and there the authority of the Congress over the colleges ended.
“There was a later act—of 1845—which gave to the States the
authority to provide by law for filling vacancies of electors in
these colleges; and Congress has passed no other law on the subject.
“The States having created them, the time of their assemblage having
been fixed by Congress, and their power to fill vacancies having
been regulated by State laws, the colleges are as independent in the
exercise of their functions as is any department of the Government
within its sphere. Being thus equipped, their powers are restrained
by a few simple limitations laid upon them by the Constitution
itself: first, they must vote for a native-born citizen; second, for
a man who has been fourteen years a resident of the United States;
third, at least one of the persons for whom they vote must not be a
citizen of their own State; fourth, the mode of voting and
certifying their returns is prescribed by the Constitution itself.
Within these simple and plain limitations the electoral colleges are
absolutely independent of the States and of Congress.
“One fact in the history of the Constitutional Convention, which I
have not seen noticed in any of the recent debates, illustrates very
clearly how careful our fathers were to preserve these colleges from
the interference of Congress, and to protect their independence by
the bulwarks of the Constitution itself. In the draught of the
electoral system reported September 4, 1787, it was provided that
Congress ‘may determine the time of choosing and assembling of the
electors _and the manner of certifying and transmitting their
votes_.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account