The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.Ridpath, John Clark
History
The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.
Ridpath, John Clark
Garfield, James A. (James Abram), 1831-1881
“That no one may charge that I pervert history to sustain my own
theories, I call attention to the fact that not one of the colonies
declared itself free and independent. Neither Virginia nor
Massachusetts threw off its allegiance to the British crown as a
colony. The great declaration was made not even by all the colonies
as colonies, but it was made in the name and by authority of ‘all
the good people of the colonies’ as one people.
“Mr. Chairman, the dogma of State Sovereignty, which has re-awakened
to such vigorous life in this chamber, has borne such bitter fruits
and entailed such suffering upon our people that it deserves more
particular notice. It should be noticed that the word ‘sovereignty’
can not be fitly applied to any government in this country. It is
not found in our constitution. It is a feudal word, born of the
despotism of the Middle Ages, and was unknown even in imperial Rome.
A ‘sovereign’ is a person, a prince, who has subjects that owe him
allegiance. There is no one paramount sovereign in the United
States. There is no person here who holds any title or authority
whatever, except the official authority given him by law. Americans
are not subjects, but citizens. Our only sovereign is the whole
people. To talk about the ‘inherent sovereignty’ of a corporation—an
artificial person—is to talk nonsense; and we ought to reform our
habit of speech on that subject.
“But what do gentlemen mean when they tell us that a State is
sovereign? What does sovereignty mean in its accepted use, but a
political corporation having no superior? Is a State of this Union
such a corporation? Let us test it by a few examples drawn from the
Constitution. No State of this Union can make war or conclude a
peace. Without the consent of Congress it can not raise or support
an army or a navy. It can not make a treaty with a foreign power,
nor enter into any agreement or compact with another State. It can
not levy imposts or duties on imports nor exports. It can not coin
money. It can not regulate commerce. It can not authorize a single
ship to go into commission anywhere on the high seas; if it should,
that ship would be seized as a pirate or confiscated by the laws of
the United States. A State can not emit bills of credit. It can
enact no law which makes any thing but gold and silver a legal
tender. It has no flag except the flag of the Union. And there are
many other subjects on which the States are forbidden by the
Constitution to legislative.
“How much inherent sovereignty is left in a corporation which is
thus shorn of all these great attributes of sovereignty?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account