The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.Ridpath, John Clark
History
The Life and Work of James A. Garfield, Twentieth President of the United States: Embracing an Account of the Scenes and Incidents of His Boyhood; the Struggles of His Youth; the Might of His Early Manhood; His Valor As a Soldier; His Career As a Statesman; His Election to the Presidency; and the Tragic Story of His Death.
Ridpath, John Clark
Garfield, James A. (James Abram), 1831-1881
“But this is not all. The Supreme Court of the United States may
declare null and void any law or any clause of the constitution of a
State which happens to be in conflict with the Constitution and laws
of the United States. Again, the States appear as plaintiffs and
defendants before the Supreme Court of the United States. They may
sue each other; and, until the Eleventh Amendment was adopted, a
citizen might sue a State. These ‘sovereigns’ may all be summoned
before their common superior to be judged. And yet they are endowed
with supreme inherent sovereignty!
“Again, the government of a State may be absolutely abolished by
Congress, in case it is not republican in form. And, finally, to cap
the climax of this absurd pretension, every right possessed by one
of these ‘sovereign’ States, every inherent sovereign right, except
the single right to equal representation in the Senate, may be taken
away, without its consent, by the vote of two-thirds of Congress and
three-fourths of the States. But, in spite of all these
disabilities, we hear them paraded as independent, sovereign States,
the creators of the Union and the dictators of its powers. How
inherently ‘sovereign’ must be that State west of the Mississippi
which the Nation bought and paid for with the public money, and
permitted to come into the Union a half century after the
Constitution was adopted! And yet we are told that the States are
inherently sovereign and created the National Government.
“The dogma of State Sovereignty in alliance with chattel slavery
made its appeal to that court of last resort where the laws are
silent, and where kings and nations appear in arms for judgment. In
that awful court of war two questions were tried: Shall slavery
live? And is a State so sovereign that it may nullify the laws and
destroy the Union? These two questions were tried on the thousand
battle-fields of the war; and if war ever ‘legislates,’ as a leading
Democrat of Ohio once wisely affirmed, then our war legislated
finally upon those subjects, and determined, beyond all controversy,
that slavery should never again live in this Republic, and that
there is not sovereignty enough in any State to authorize its people
either to destroy the Union or nullify its laws.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account