When Cowper's translation of Homer appeared, Geddes, who was a great
admirer of Pope, was irritated beyond measure at the work, but chiefly
by the praises bestowed in the preface upon Fuseli; and he had not
sufficient prudence even to hide what he felt, but a detail of this will
be given best in the words of his intimate friend, admirer, and
biographer, the late Doctor I. Mason Good.
"Pope was the idol of Geddes, and estimated by him as highly
above Cowper, as Cowper was above his contemporaries: and he
could not but look with a jealous eye upon any one who attempted
to rival the poet of his heart. Geddes was disgusted with Cowper
from the very first page, and in a fit of undue exasperation
declared he would translate Homer himself, and show that it was
possible to make as good versification, while he preserved not
only all the epithets and phraseologies of the original, which
Mr. Cowper has not done, but the very order itself. Yet what
appears principally to have irritated him, was Mr. Cowper's
declaration, towards the close of his preface, of acknowledgments
'to the learned and ingenious Mr. Fuseli,' whom he styles in the
same place 'the best critic in Homer I have ever met with.'
"Accident had frequently thrown Dr. Geddes and Mr. Fuseli into
the same company, and much learned dust had as frequently been
excited between the two critical combatants, not at all times to
the amusement of the rest of the respective parties. Whatever
opinion Mr. Fuseli may have entertained of the powers of his
antagonist, it is certain that Doctor Geddes was not very deeply
impressed with those of Mr. Fuseli, and that he scarcely allowed
him the merit to which he is actually entitled. When, therefore,
he found in Mr. Cowper's preface, that instead of consulting the
profound erudition and sterling authorities of Stephens, Clarke,
Ernesti, and Velloison, he had turned to Mr. Fuseli as his only
oracle, and had gloried in submitting to the whole of his
corrections and emendations: to his disappointment at the
inadequacy of the version, was added a contempt of the quarter to
which he had fled for assistance.
"Geddes resolved to translate Homer, and in the beginning of
1792, published a translation of the first book as a specimen. In
the preface he says, 'I beg leave to assure my readers that
neither _Fuseli nor any other profound critic_ in Homer, has
given me the smallest assistance; the whole merit or demerit of
my version rests solely with myself.' The attempt failed, and he
never succeeded beyond the first book."
CHAPTER V.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account