The Life of Captain James Cook, the CircumnavigatorKitson, Arthur
History
The Life of Captain James Cook, the Circumnavigator
Kitson, Arthur
Cook, James, 1728-1779; Explorers -- Great Britain -- Biography; Geographers -- Great Britain -- Biography
Mr. Banks did not approve of the reduction in his accommodation
necessitated by these alterations, and tried to get a 40-gun ship in
place of the Resolution, and he and his friends succeeded in raising a
very acrimonious discussion on the subject; but the admiralty stood firm,
and the alterations went on under the superintendence of Cook. On 24th
May Banks and Solander went to inspect her, and on their return to town
Banks wrote to the Admiralty that he should not go the voyage as "the
ship was neither roomy nor convenient enough for my purpose, nor no ways
proper for the voyage." Cook, who says the preparations had cost Banks
"about five Thousand Pounds," does not think that the reasons given by
Banks were the only ones he had for not taking part in the voyage, and
then continues, "their baggage, etc., were got out of the sloop and sent
to London, after which no more complaints were heard of want of room,
etc."
Lieutenant Clerke, who was very friendly with Banks, wrote to him on 31st
May:
"Indeed I am sorry I'm not to have the honour of attending you the other
bout...They are going to stow the major part of the cables in the hold to
make room for the people now. I asked Gilbert [the Master], if such was
the present case, what the devil should we have done if we had all gone?
'Oh, by God, that was impossible,' was his answer."
Marra (the gunner's mate), in a Journal of the voyage, published by
Newberry, 1775, says the success of the voyage was due to their having
shaken off:
"the train of gentlemen, who with their attendants occupied the chief
accommodations of the ship," and whose presence would have rendered it
"out of the power of the most determined officer to have carried such a
princely retinue through the icy regions which they were to pass, without
murmurs, or perhaps mutiny."
Some of the newspapers tried to make political matter out of the affair,
and one at any rate roundly declared that "the true reason" of Banks's
withdrawal was on account of a remonstrance from the Spanish Ambassador
against any further exploration of the South Seas.
The withdrawal of Banks made no difference to his friendship with Cook,
and in the future he was always ready to afford his support whenever it
could be of any service either to his friend or family.
JOHN REINHOLD FORSTER.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account