"Let us then assume, as is very probable, that motion is dispensed by
the sun in the same manner as light. The proportion in which light
emanating from a centre is diminished, is taught by optical writers: for
there is the same quantity of light, or of the solar rays, in the small
circles as in the large; and therefore, as it is more condensed in the
former, more attenuated in the latter, a measure of the attenuation may
be derived from the proportion of the circles themselves, both in the
case of light and of the moving virtue. Therefore, by how much the orbit
of Venus is greater than that of Mercury, in the same proportion will
the motion of the latter be stronger, or more hurried, or more swift, or
more powerful, or by whatever other word you like to express the fact,
than that of the former. But a larger orbit would require a
proportionably longer time of revolution, even though the moving force
were the same. Hence it follows that the one cause of a greater distance
of the planet from the Sun, produces a double effect in increasing the
period, and conversely the increase of the periods will be double the
difference of the distances. Therefore, half the increment added to the
shorter period ought to give the true proportion of the distances, so
that the sum should represent the distance of the superior planet, on
the same scale on which the shorter period represents the distance of
the interior one. For instance, the period of Mercury is nearly 88 days;
that of Venus is 224⅔, the difference is 136⅔: half of this is 68⅓,
which, added to 88, gives 156⅓. The mean distance of Venus ought,
therefore, to be, in proportion to that of Mercury, as 156⅓ to 88. If
this be done with all the planets, we get the following results, taking
successively, as before, the distance of each planet at 1000.
The distance in parts of which } ♃ 574 But according { 572
the distance of the next } ♂ 274 to Copernicus { 290
superior planet contains 1000, } ♁ 694 they are { 658
is at } ♀ 762 respectively { 719
} ☿ 563 { 500
As you see, we have now got nearer the truth."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account