Irish prospects had not looked brighter in the House for many a year,
but, unfortunately, only two days after the memorable afternoon on
which Mr. Gladstone dissociated himself from his sometime Irish
Minister and threw himself into Parnell's arms, England was horrified
by a terrible tragedy. Lord Spencer and Lord Frederick Cavendish had
been appointed to the vacant offices of Lord Cowper and Mr. Forster.
The new Chief Secretary and Mr. Burke, permanent Under-Secretary,
were murdered close to the Vice-regal Lodge in Phœnix Park, on the
evening following Lord Spencer's state entry into Dublin. Mr.
O'Brien, in his _Life of Parnell_, says that "Cavendish was killed
simply {175} through the accident of his being with Mr. Burke, whose
death was the real object of the assassins."[6] No one was more
overwhelmed by the tragedy than Parnell himself. "How can I," he
said, "carry on a public agitation if I am stabbed in the back in
this way?"
The House met on the 8th, and Parnell made a short, straightforward
speech, condemning the outrages in unqualified terms. He also
expressed the fear that the Government would feel themselves obliged,
under the circumstances, to revert to coercion. His fear was
justified, and on May 11, the Home Secretary, Sir William Harcourt,
introduced a Crimes Bill, based on previous suggestions of Lord
Cowper.
It is easy to see now that this proceeding was a mistake. It should
have been evident to any unbiassed observer that, far from Parnell
and the League being responsible for outrages, whether agrarian or
political, it was during the imprisonment of Parnell and after the
dissolution of the League that they increased and finally led up to
the tragedy of Phœnix Park. But the Government had to count with
English opinion, which was exasperated by the murder of Burke and
Cavendish almost to the point of hysteria. To most English people
Ireland was little more than a geographical expression; in so far as
it connoted anything else, it bored and disgusted them. Parnell
indicated the true inwardness of Mr. Gladstone's altered attitude in
a speech on May 20, in which he said: "I regret that the event in
Phœnix Park has prevented him (Mr. Gladstone) continuing the
course of conciliation that we had expected from him. I regret that,
owing to the exigencies of his party, of his position in the country,
he has felt himself compelled to turn from that course of
conciliation and concession into the horrible paths of coercion."
Labouchere took Mr. Parnell's view of the situation, and argued with
much zest against the worst features of the Crimes Bill. Speaking on
May 18, on the second reading, {176} he said that it was clear from
the fact that the House was now asked to pass a remedial measure (the
Arrears Bill) and a Coercion Bill that the former policy of the
Government had been a failure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account