Public opinion in England was deeply stirred by the disaster at
Shekan, and one of those popular cries that are so often and so
disastrously interpreted as heavenly voices went up all over the
land. The nation called for Gordon. The question of Gordon's
mission has been exhaustively discussed from every point of view.
The responsibility for his failure and tragic death is apportioned by
Lord Cromer between Gordon himself and the Government who overruled
his (Cromer's) objection to employing him, and went on to make every
mistake they could. Gordon misinterpreted his orders, and the
Government was then made responsible for the consequences of a policy
of which they had never dreamt. He thus placed himself in a
situation from which it was impossible to extricate him in time. Mr.
Wilfrid Blunt, on the other hand, places the responsibility of the
tragedy principally at the door of Cromer. I am not here concerned
with this delicate controversy. Of this at least there is no doubt,
Gordon's mission was understood by the country and Parliament to be
of a purely peaceful nature. Its avowed object was one which
approved itself to Liberal ideas, _i.e._ the disengaging of British
responsibility from a purely Egyptian matter and the rescue of the
Egyptian garrisons. Radicals understood that these purposes were to
be achieved by purely peaceful means. The Mahdi was presumably to be
approached by recognised methods of negotiation. It is well known
that when Gordon got to Khartoum, these instructions went by the
board. He had been nominated, while on his way, at Cairo,
Governor-General of the Soudan, and the Government left, by means
{213} of supplementary clauses in their instructions, a considerable
latitude to Baring under whose orders, at his (Baring's) request,
Gordon was placed. Lord Cromer has told the world in his _Modern
Egypt_ of the difficulties of the situation. Gordon was a mystic and
suffered chronically from "inspirations," which changed a dozen times
a day. He does not seem to have made any attempt to carry out his
mission by diplomatic methods. He soon came to conceive of that
mission as a sort of rival "Mahdism." He became the Angel of the
Lord fighting with Apollyon. All this must have been inexpressibly
disconcerting to the prudent _homme d'affaires_ at Cairo, and no less
so to his nominal superior in Downing Street.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account