Many Conservatives are excellent citizens, others are party men. The
latter would probably not object to the latter alternative. It would
unquestionably have the effect of the French wars in the days of
George III. They, I fully admit, would be better able to carry out a
system of repression than the Radicals. They therefore would in the
main hold office. Domestic reforms would be neglected, the Radical
chariot would stand still. You, Sir, I apprehend, are not a Radical,
and though you may not be influenced by this arrest of the chariot,
you would not regret the _propter hoc_. But it ought to lead any
Radical to pause and reflect.
I did not show myself a fanatical worshipper of Mr. Gladstone during
the last Parliament, in fact I must have voted against him as often
as I voted for him. In my address to my constituents I said that I
should raise my voice against any Administration, no matter what it
be called, that lags on the path of progress or that falls into
error. My constituents have been good enough to leave it to me to
decide what is lagging and what is error. If the Conservatives will
at once bring in a Bill dealing with Ireland in the manner I have
indicated they shall have my vote as far as that Bill is concerned.
But I gather that they have determined to oppose a _non possumus_ to
all such demands and not to go beyond including Irish in any general
scheme for local Government in both islands.
I turn therefore to Mr. Gladstone. His public utterances lead me to
believe that he is prepared to sacrifice his well-earned ease, and to
endeavour to settle the question in a manner satisfactory to us and
to the Irish. His experience is vast, his patriotism is undoubted,
his tactical skill is unrivalled. I would suggest therefore that we
should give him full powers to treat for us with the Irish, and that
we should support him in any arrangement which meets with his
sanction. The Irish have always had a {297} sneaking affection for
him; they will recognise that he has to count with English public
opinion, and they will concede far more to him than to any other
negotiator that we might select. I have seen that Lord Hartington
and Mr. Forster have pronounced against Home Rule, and that the
former is negotiating with Mr. Goschen. Lord Hartington generally
pronounces against a measure as a preliminary to accepting it; I do
not therefore ascribe much importance to his declaration. Mr.
Forster, during the last Parliament, distinguished himself by
uttering, in season and out of season, gibes and sarcasms against his
former colleagues. Mr. Goschen, a man of great ability and honesty,
could not find one English Liberal Constituency to return him, and
sits in Parliament by the good favour of the Edinburgh Conservatives.
With all respect therefore to the two gentlemen, I hardly think that
the Liberals will accept a policy from them. If we are to judge by
what happened in the last Parliament they have no followers.... Let
Mr.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account