The reflections of boys on the education to which they have been
subjected are remarkably interesting, because they are so exceedingly
rare. We have Rousseau's criticism of his upbringing, but it was
penned when youth was behind, and it is tinged with an affectation of
intellectual detachment and middle-aged self-consciousness which robs
it of the spontaneity which would be its only recommendation. St.
Augustine, when he wrote his confessions, knew far too much to be
able to write with simple sincerity of his foolish youth.
Labouchere's early note-books, unlike these masterpieces, possess the
uncommon value of being youth's judgments upon youth, written with
all the hardy ingenuousness of a clever boy, who was, besides being
clever, extremely young for his age.[8] About the period of his life
which has been described Labouchere wrote, at the age of twenty-one:
"I will give ... an outline of my life, and the different courses
that led to my discovery of early wisdom. I went through the usual
numbers of schools, by which I learnt that an English education, for
the time and money that it consumes, is the worst that the world has
yet produced. One {22} clergyman alone of all my masters knew how to
teach. His conduct was perfectly arbitrary, and he gave no reason
for it--while, in the several branches of learning, his pupils either
made rapid progress or left his house. My acquaintance with him was
of short duration. He insisted on my teaching in an infant school on
Sunday, or leaving his house--and I foolishly preferred the latter.
I was then too young to go to college, so I was transferred to a
clergyman in Norfolk, the very antipodes of my former master. Here I
amused myself, and was flattered for a year or two, and then went to
the university."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account