The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume IThayer, Alexander Wheelock
History
The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume I
Thayer, Alexander Wheelock
Beethoven, Ludwig van, 1770-1827
Schindler’s record of his conversations upon Beethoven with Cramer
and Cherubini in 1841 is interesting and valuable. He has, however,
left one important consideration unnoticed, namely, that the visits
of those masters to Vienna were five years apart--five years of
great change in Beethoven--a period during which his deafness, too
slight to attract Cramer’s attention, had increased to a degree
beyond concealment, and which, joined to his increased devotion to
composition and compulsory abandonment of all ambition as a virtuoso,
with consequent neglect of practice, had affected his execution
unfavorably. Hence the difference in the opinions of such competent
judges as Cramer, describing him as he was in 1799-1800, Cherubini in
1805-6, and two years later Clementi, afford a doubtless just and fair
indication of the decline of Beethoven’s powers as a mere pianist--not
extending, however, at least for some years yet, to his extemporaneous
performances. We shall find from Ries and others ample confirmation of
the fact.
And now let Schindler speak:
To the warm feeling of Cramer for Beethoven I owe the more
important matters.... Cherubini, disposed to be curt,
characterized Beethoven’s pianoforte playing in a single word:
“rough.” The gentleman Cramer, however, desired that less offence
be taken at the rudeness of his performance than at the unreliable
reading of one and the same composition--one day intellectually
brilliant and full of characteristic expression, the next freakish
to the verge of unclearness; often confused. (Which is confirmed
by Ries, Czerny and others.) Because of this a few friends
expressed a wish to hear Cramer play several works publicly from
the manuscript. This touched a sensitive spot in Beethoven; his
jealousy was aroused and, according to Cramer, their relations
became strained.
This strain, however, left no such sting behind it as to diminish
Cramer’s good opinion of Beethoven both as man and artist, or hinder
his free expression of it. To this fact the concurrent testimony of
his widow and son, and those enthusiasts for Beethoven Charles Neate,
Cipriani Potter and others who knew Cramer well, bear witness. It was
the conversation of Cramer about Beethoven which induced Potter, after
the fall of Napoleon, to journey to Vienna, to make the acquaintance of
the great master and, if possible, become his pupil.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account