The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume IIThayer, Alexander Wheelock
History
The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume II
Thayer, Alexander Wheelock
Beethoven, Ludwig van, 1770-1827
In truth, Beethoven had overshot the mark. The overture was too novel
in form and grand in substance to be immediately understood; and, in
1806, there was not an audience in Europe able to find, in the fire and
expression of the principal vocal numbers, an adequate compensation
for the superficial graces and melodic beauties of the favorite operas
of the time, and which seemed to them to be wanting in “Fidelio.” Even
Cherubini, who was all this time in Vienna, failed to comprehend fully
a work which, though a first and only experiment, was destined to an
ever-increasing popularity, when nearly all his own then universally
admired operas had disappeared from the stage. Schindler records that
he “told the musicians of Paris concerning the overture that because of
its confusion of modulations he was unable to recognize the principal
key.” And farther, that he (Cherubini), in listening to “Fidelio,” had
come to the conclusion that till then Beethoven had paid too little
heed to the art of singing, for which Salieri was not to blame.
In 1836, Schindler conversed with the ~Fidelio~ of 1805-06, Madame
Milder-Hauptmann, on the subject: “She said, among other things, that
she, too, had had severe struggles with the master chiefly about the
unbeautiful, unsingable passages, unsuited to her voice, in the Adagio
of the air in E major--but all in vain, until, in 1814, she declared
that she would never sing the air again in its then shape. That worked.”
Anselm Hüttenbrenner, who became a pupil of Salieri a dozen years
later, wrote in a letter to Ferdinand Luib, under date February 21,
1858: “Speaking of Beethoven Salieri told me the composer had submitted
‘Fidelio’ to him for an opinion: he had taken exception to many
things and advised Beethoven to make certain changes; but Beethoven
had ‘Fidelio’ performed just as he had written it--and never visited
Salieri again.” These last words are too strong; Beethoven’s pique
against his old master was in time forgotten; for Moscheles (also in a
letter to Luib) writes on February 28, 1858: “I cannot recall seeing
Schubert at Salieri’s, but I do remember the interesting circumstance
that once I saw a sheet of paper lying at Salieri’s on which in great
letters written by Beethoven were the words: ‘~The pupil Beethoven was
here!~’”
A letter by Beethoven to Baron von Braun refers to the incidents just
described and asks permission to get from the theatre orchestral parts,
as follows:
~Flauto primo~, the three trombones and the four horn parts of my
opera. I need these parts, but only for a day, in order to have a
few trifles copied for myself which ~could not be written into the
score for want of room~, also because ~Prince Lobkowitz~ thinks ~of
giving the opera at his house~ and has asked it of me.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account