The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
cost, in order to compare their report with that of Marco Pasha. On
the demand of the Public Prosecutor, the Court retired to consider
Midhat’s request, and decided to grant it on condition that the
prisoners should not be interrogated separately. To this reply Midhat
opposed the text of the Code of Criminal procedure, and demanded its
application, declaring that he must question those who had given
evidence, in order to prove that they had committed perjury. The
President answered that the article in question in the Code referred
to witnesses, and not to the accused, and declared that if any person
had committed perjury it would be for the Court to punish them
hereafter.
“Midhat maintained that the prisoners who accused him should be
regarded as witnesses against him, and considering, therefore, the
decision of the tribunal as a miscarriage of justice, he declined to
defend himself further, adding in a bitter tone, that he would derive
little practical advantage from the punishment of a false witness
after he was in his grave. The Court again retired for deliberation,
and on returning after a few minutes, the President declared that
Midhat’s request could not be granted. The prisoner, having three
times declined to continue his defence, the President declared the
proceedings at an end, and the Court retired to deliberate, returning
after about an hour with a verdict of ‘Guilty’ against all the
accused. The Court will meet again this morning at eleven o’clock
to pronounce judgment, when this extraordinary, sensational trial,
conducted as I reported, will come to a close.”
_Later._—“Judgment was delivered this morning in the cases of the
persons convicted of the murder of ex‐Sultan Abdul Aziz. Nine of the
accused, including the Sultan’s two brothers‐in‐law and Midhat Pasha,
were condemned to death. The remaining two accused were condemned to
penal servitude.
“All the prisoners gave notice of appeal.”
_Reuter’s Telegram._—“_Constantinople, 29th June._—The Court
pronounced judgment and delivered sentence of death upon Midhat
Pasha, Mahmoud Damad Pasha, Nouri Pasha, Ali Bey, Nedjib Bey, Fahri
Bey, Hadji Mehmed, Mustapha the Wrestler, and Mustapha the Gardener.
“Izzet and Sayd are each sentenced to ten years’ penal servitude. The
prisoners have eight days allowed them to give notice of Appeal, and
the indictment and document connected with the trial will be sent to
the Court which will try the Appeal.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account