The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
“_Times,” 4th July 1881._—“_Constantinople, 1st July._”—In
telegraphing about the recent State Trial, I have been
hitherto working under serious restrictions, which I was not
allowed to mention in my telegrams. All telegraphic despatches
on the subject had to be submitted to the authorities, who
naturally prevented the transmission of anything that might
be disagreeable to the Palace. In the circumstances, it
was, of course, impossible to criticise the proceedings,
or even to give a full account of what took place. I have
now, fortunately, an opportunity of communicating with you
freely, and I hasten to declare that the trial was little
better than a parody of European judicial procedure, which
has justly roused the indignation, not only of foreign
observers, but also of many Turks, who have an elementary
conception of justice and fair play. In a trial in which the
political element was so prominent, the first condition to
be observed was complete neutrality of the Palace, and this
condition was most grossly violated. It was at the Palace that
the preliminary investigation was made, under the immediate
personal direction of the Sultan, who is an interested party.
It was at the Palace that the prisoners were confined, judges
chosen, and even the counsel for the defence appointed,
without the prisoners themselves being consulted. It was
at the Palace that the accused were examined and various
unjustifiable means were employed to extort confessions from
them—as, for example, when the Grand Eunuch, one of the three
highest official personages of the Empire, struck with his
fists and otherwise maltreated the Chamberlain, Fahri Bey,
when under examination, in the presence of His Majesty. It
was in the Palace, and under the immediate influence of the
Sultan, that the amount of the punishment for the accused was
considered and decided. It was in the Palace that Sourouri
Effendi, the President of the Tribunal, had a private
audience with the Sultan, immediately before the opening of
the proceedings, while a Palace dignitary appealed to the
counsel for the defence in a cajoling, half‐plaintive tone,
to refrain, in the fulfilment of their duty, from adding
to the Sultan’s already numerous embarrassments! Lastly,
it was in the immediate vicinity of the Palace that the
trial was held. Soldiers of the Palace garrison surrounded
the Court, aides‐de‐camp and other Palace officials were
present, while eunuchs and other confidential messengers
were constantly passing to and fro between the Palace and
the tribunal. A certain amount of publicity was allowed with
regard to the trial, for a few tickets were distributed among
the Diplomatic Corps and leading representatives of the
Press, but there were at the same time serious restrictions
and difficulties. The date of the trial was kept strictly
secret until a few hours before the proceedings began, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account