The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
“The three Northern and allied Powers” were evidently disconcerted by
the turn matters were taking at Constantinople. It seemed impossible
to present a comminatory note to a new Sultan and a new Government
established by a revolution, the very purpose and aim of which was to
introduce practical reforms in the country, without a certain delay
demanded by equity and even decency. They determined to make it as
short as possible.
In spite, however, of strenuous efforts to conceal the fact,
differences had arisen among “the allied Courts,” or rather between
the two principal parties interested. Russia was in favour of an
occupation of the three disturbed provinces, with a view to the
eventual establishment of autonomies on the model of Servia and
Roumania. Austria was dead opposed to both propositions. There is no
doubt that she had been working up to an occupation by her own troops
of Bosnia and Herzegovina as the mandate of Europe—up to the time of
the Bulgarian insurrection; but now that such an occupation would be
accompanied by a Russian occupation of Bulgaria, she entirely changed
her mind. If a joint occupation took place, the last state of those
provinces would be worse than the first. At present she had the
strategical advantage of position over Russia, but Russia in Bulgaria
would have it over her. She was firmly opposed to joint occupation.
Neither would autonomy suit her. The establishment of autonomous
provinces, placed under the guarantee of the Great Powers, would make
the absorption by herself of these coveted possessions impossible.
Count Andrassy put his foot down against both these proposals.
A very active interchange of ideas consequently took place during the
whole of the month of June between the two Empires, and it was here
that the full value of a third partner, the disinterested broker, was
revealed. Russia evidently meant business, for Servia, which was, as
Consul‐General White explained, absolutely in her hands, now (1st
July 1876) formally declared war against Turkey, and invaded the
Ottoman territory. Montenegro followed her example. In the latter
case it was rather a superfluous or _ex post facto_ formality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account