The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murderAli Haydar Mithat
History
The life of Midhat Pasha; a record of his services, political reforms, banishment, and judicial murder
Ali Haydar Mithat
Midhat Paşa, 1822-1884; Statesmen -- Turkey -- Biography; Turkey -- History -- 19th century
A knot had occurred worthy of the interposition of the gods, and on
the 8th July a meeting was arranged at Reichstadt between the Emperor
Francis Joseph and the Czar. Of course it is only in Homeric times
that accounts of the interviews of Olympic gods were vouchsafed to
men, and simple mortals have to content themselves nowadays with
being told the results of these interviews. The result of this
particular interview was “very satisfactory.” According to Sir A.
Buchanan, “the Emperor and Count Andrassy returned last night (10th
July 1876) _greatly satisfied_ with the interview of Reichstadt.”
“The Emperors parted on the best terms; they agreed to maintain the
present principle of non‐intervention, reserving for the future the
expediency of coming to an understanding with the Great Powers,
according to circumstances which may arise.”[34] So, according to
this authority, the Emperor of Austria returned to Vienna “greatly
satisfied” with doing nothing. It was scarcely worth while going all
the way to Reichstadt for that. It was, however, generally supposed
in well‐informed chancelleries in Europe at the time, and subsequent
events greatly corroborated the surmise, that the Emperor had
something else to be greatly satisfied about than what was vouchsafed
to Sir A. Buchanan.
It was said that two specific points had been formally agreed upon
between the rulers of these two military Empires, in presence
of the threatening aspect that affairs were assuming. (1) That,
should affairs in the East eventuate in war between Turkey and
Russia, Russia would, under no circumstances, seek any territorial
acquisition _in Europe_. (2) That Bosnia and Herzegovina should be
considered within the exclusive sphere of Austria’s influence, and
that Russia would not actively oppose any arrangement with respect
to them that Europe might propose. All the rest would be left to
their respective chancellors, each would retain his liberty of action
and pursue the policy he deemed the best, certain that nothing that
could happen in the way of differences of opinion between them could
bring about a rupture between the two Empires. The middle term of an
agreement had evidently been found. “British interests” would pay the
bill, and the desertion of Bucharest would be avenged.
By a curious coincidence, on the same day (8th July) that this
historical interview took place, there appeared in the _Daily News_
the famous “atrocity article” that set all England ablaze and
started the greatest orator of the day on his crusade against the
“unspeakable Turk.”
The indirect effect on English policy of this crusade and the
atrocity meetings all over England that followed it, was seen in the
nuance already noticed, between the terms of the despatch of the 25th
May and that of the 25th September, which was the prelude to the
Conference where it was still further accentuated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account